Home || Contact || Help Registering and Participating || Advertise || Guidelines || Sponsors |
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 2
![]() |
Champion tree?
I am cataloging large tree's on my property in douglas county. I was wondering if I could recevie some feedback on what you would consider the appropriate size for a specie in order to be called a "trophy" and be deserving of recognizing.
What circumference for Red Pine 80 inches? White Pine 90 inches Scotch Pine 80 inches. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Above average climber
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: South Eastern WI
Posts: 13,267
![]() |
http://www.arboristsite.com/showthread.php?t=38474
Read this thread and see if you have any more questions. WI uses the most common champion formula.
__________________
John Paul Sanborn Subcontracting Arborist - Consulting Arborist Southeastern Wisconsin ***** 414-379-0442 sanbornremovethisstrees@yahoo.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 2
![]() |
Big Pines
Thanks for the reply. I know how to measure a champion tree. I was simply asking if you were attaching a number marker to a big pine tree for future generations to note. what size of tree in circumference would you conside worthy of noting. ie is an 80 inch circumference red pine somehting that you would tag so that your family could observe and measure through the years. Or would it take a larger cuircumfence, for you to take note of the tree.
I guess its like asking what size pine in sand country would make you go ooooo! We have white, red, jack and scotch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Above average climber
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: South Eastern WI
Posts: 13,267
![]() |
C is the variable with the heaviest weight.
You could download the WI champion tree DB. I guess we can no longer see the excel form. http://dnr.wi.gov/forestry/Uf/champi...=Scotch%20Pine is a search for scotch (sic) pine the db is not maintained; due to lack of staffing it is on the back burner. Not having the variable sucks, because I have ruled a number out by just C. I ballparked the H because of seeing the top in inner city back yards was problematic. One monster bur oak came in at ~13 on the list even though I was generous with H.
__________________
John Paul Sanborn Subcontracting Arborist - Consulting Arborist Southeastern Wisconsin ***** 414-379-0442 sanbornremovethisstrees@yahoo.com Last edited by John Paul Sanborn; 10-24-2009 at 08:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Arboristsite MVP
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NW Wisconsin
Posts: 660
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Those 80-inchers are nice sized red pines and are verging on "old growth" so yes, they are noteworthy and IMO should be protected for future generations. But they also make great lumber. Same with the white pine. However, I wonder about the Scotch pine. That is not a native tree so yours must have been planted. Do you know the history on that Scotch pine? Here I there is a plantation planted around WWI with some Scotch pine in it. One of the first pine plantations in the state. Also, one old German guy once told me that relatives in Europe sent them some pine tree seeds around 1905-10 which they then planted and grew up to a large size. I never did go try to find them although he said they were still there. I should do that this spring. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|