cc for cc

[441_Stihl]

hi all which saw cc for cc has the most power

 

[PES+]

HAAAAAAAhahaaaaahahaa

Stock?
current or past?
Need to set limits or parameters

 

[441_Stihl]

Stock?
current or past?
Need to set limits or parameters

between the 50 cc range to 60 cc range

 

[spacemule]

between the 50 cc range to 60 cc range

In that range I would go for half an 088. :hmm3grin2orange:

 

[ciscoguy01]

Ohhhhhhhh man

You just opened up Pandora's box there dude... I applaud you, lmao.

 

[441_Stihl]

You just opened up Pandora's box there dude... I applaud you, lmao.

Thank you cisco

 

[PES+]

:welcome:
opcorn:

 

[stihl025]

I am fond of my new (used) Husky 357XP. More power than I expected out of a 57CC, and I didn't even mod the muffler yet.

 

[Monk]

In that range I would go for half an 088.

He said 50 to 60 not 120 to 130 you are looking at like a 361 in that size range I would say one is as good as the next

 

[Monk]

sorry space misread what you wrote

 

[SawTroll]

In the 50-60 cc class (stock saws), Dolmar PS 5100S, Stihl MS361 and Husky 357xp - in that order.


....but who really cares - power to weight ratio is much more interesting....

 

[computeruser]

I was really impressed with a couple of Rick Helsel's Husqvarnas...

 

[wagonwheeler]

In the 50-60 cc class (stock saws), Dolmar PS 5100S, Stihl MS361 and Husky 357xp - in that order.


....but who really cares - power to weight ratio is much more interesting....

Yeah, where did that power to weight ratio chart go?

Chaser

 

[oldsaw]

hi all which saw cc for cc has the most power

I think that you would be more interested in useable power band than the peak power number the mfgr would like you to buy into. You are kind of asking the wrong question.

I work in the audio business and can tell you firsthand...numbers lie. Its what they do best.

Mark

 

[Lakeside53]

Surely someone like Sawtroll :biggrinbounce2: will make a table showing cc verses HP verses... for all saws since 1965.

 

[SawTroll]

I think that you would be more interested in useable power band than the peak power number the mfgr would like you to buy into. You are kind of asking the wrong question. ....

I agree, but usable power band would be pretty hard to define.......:bang:

 

[B_Turner]

I agree, but usable power band would be pretty hard to define.......:bang:

The smooth usable power band is what makes the 7900 so fun to run. So in that cc class that saw gets my vote for power to weight stock.

 

[oldsaw]

I agree, but usable power band would be pretty hard to define.......:bang:

Not really. Like a car or a motorcycle, just look at the torque curve. If it is a tall, narrow peak...not good. Get the chain in the wood, the saw bogs at the first opportunity...bad.

Mark

 

[MacDaddy]

Mac BP-1

 

[SawTroll]

Not really. Like a car or a motorcycle, just look at the torque curve. If it is a tall, narrow peak...not good. Get the chain in the wood, the saw bogs at the first opportunity...bad.

Mark

That's right, but still pretty hard to define ........