Chain for a 395xp 62" bar? Skip vs ripping?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

edrrt

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
124
Reaction score
45
Location
northern california
I need to make a few larger slabs and was looking at a Forrester 62" bar for my 395.

3/8, .063, 185DL

They don't seem to make 3/8 skip milling chain?

Is it worth swapping to a .404 to access the skip milling chains available? Wouldn't it increase drag?

Should I swap to a 7 tooth sprocket?

Am I thinking to hard and a standard ripping chain is fine just go easy?

Thanks everyone.
 
Howdy,
If you're just interested in speed and the surface of the wood doesn't matter, use the standard tooth chain. If you're wanting a nice surface, use ripping chain. Standard 3/8, or larger pitch will require more hp than ripping because they take a wider bite. Go with the 7 tooth.
G
 
Howdy,
If you're just interested in speed and the surface of the wood doesn't matter, use the standard tooth chain. If you're wanting a nice surface, use ripping chain. Standard 3/8, or larger pitch will require more hp than ripping because they take a wider bite. Go with the 7 tooth.
G
He really does exist!
 
https://loggerchain.net/collections...kip-ripping-chainsaw-chain-reel-404-pitch-063They make it in .404
The one major difference between semi chisel and ripping chain is that ripping chain is filed at a 10° angle to the side plate as apposed to 25-30° , you can file semi chisel to 10 and achieve the same results and it comes in skip.
Graneberg also sells a modified skip that has half the cutter top plate cut in half. It works very well.
 
Yes Granberg looks like the best plug and play option but they are sold out. They believe they will get more by mid March but who knows.

I ended up with a 52" bar and suspect I will only get 48" in wood.

Should I try regular milling chain and see if it will pull it or skip and gradually bring the angle back?
 
Yes Granberg looks like the best plug and play option but they are sold out. They believe they will get more by mid March but who knows.

I ended up with a 52" bar and suspect I will only get 48" in wood.

Should I try regular milling chain and see if it will pull it or skip and gradually bring the angle back?
Granberg grind is probably the most universal that will work decently with any species around the wolrd. Certainly tweaks can be made to optimize efficiency on different species and different degrees of dryness. No matter which chain you choose that'll be a good pull on a 395 if you have the mill maximized. No matter how you slice it, there's a trade off between speed of operation, and smoothness of surface. If you're doing dimensions that are going to be hard to resurface, go with a chain ground for ripping. Even if you decide to buy a standard chain and you want the surface smooth, grind it to ripping before you start. The money in time saved on resurfacing will far out weigh the cost of grinding off a little tooth.
If you do buy a standard chain I would suggest running the way it came just to get a baseline surface to judge for your application.
 
The following are presented in chronological order using my bigger CSMs.

One of the first logs I cut with my big mill in 2007
Sheoak (hard), square ground, skip chain
.sawcloseup.jpg
Also in 2007, Queensland Box (hard) ,skip chain square ground
grain.jpg

Around the same time
Western Australian red gum (very hard) skip chain, square ground
finish.jpg
Later in mid 2008 I switched to full comp chain.
Lebanese Cedar
grain.jpg
Mov 2008. 42" wide Spotted gum (hard) full comp
grain1.jpg

Mid 2009 Marri (about as hard as oak) , full comp
smoothness1.jpg

Mod 2014 Spotted gum (hard) full comp.
finish.jpg

Looking at the above its tempting to say that "full comp is possibly better skip chain", but what I think it shows is as I gained experience with the big CSM the following contributed to improving the finish.
- better firmer/steadier log rail setups.
- maintaining sharpness
- no horizontal seesawing
- no "fanging" a running saw on restart into a cut.
- maintaining steady pressure on the mill by using slopes etc

In other words finish is highly operator ,rather than chain, dependent.
 
What is "Fanging?"

I have noticed significant improvement in the finish over the last few days as my technique has gotten better.
 
Was off working another industry for a few years. It was all smoke and mirrors. Well, maybe not so much mirrors. I'm going to be helping get a retail shop rolling in Laytonville again.



What kinda shop? I'm up outside of Garberville.




Bob, excellent visual examples of improvement of finish.


Rail accuracy, sharpness/depths, and angle of attack (edit: which includes FANGING) with the mill seem to make the biggest difference on finish and lack of surface marks.


I've had a few flawless slabs. You can see and feel the difference in the cut, when milling.
 
Howdy,
It's a retail shop mostly doing arborist supplies. I'm working on getting some dealerships in here but, I'm mostly working on getting a more robust point of sale software going. We're in the front of the old Bailey's building.
D's Woodsman Supply.
G
 

Latest posts

Back
Top