M.D. Vaden
vadenphotography.com
A certain tree this week, brought to mind a thought in a way I had not considered before.
Why is it that I (or we) commonly see trees (property development) with damaged trunks, damaged limbs, and messed-up soil conditions, but when it comes to many of the arborists working, there are not a bunch of dents and tears in the siding and roof of buildings?
Even if many contractors did not understand soil and roots, just from an aesthetic point of view, it seems innexcusable.
Every workplace should have ethics and manners.
When we go in a house, we should wipe our feet, when loggers go in a store, they should switch footwear if their boots are spiked. If gravel is spilled on a sidewalk, it should be swept.
Ethics follows consideration and common sense. And ethical work in a workplace includes keeping as much of what remains undamaged and tidy.
So why is it that most tree services I know of - even some "hacks" - don't bruise up the buildings, but quite a few contractors I watch develop property, batter and scar the trees and limbs?
Everything has to have a reason. And every habit manifests a character trait.
What does this mean to you?
Why are arborists frequently called in to prescribe protection zones for trees, but I have yet to see a contractor called in to prescribe a protection zone for a builiding where tree work will be done?
Why is it that I (or we) commonly see trees (property development) with damaged trunks, damaged limbs, and messed-up soil conditions, but when it comes to many of the arborists working, there are not a bunch of dents and tears in the siding and roof of buildings?
Even if many contractors did not understand soil and roots, just from an aesthetic point of view, it seems innexcusable.
Every workplace should have ethics and manners.
When we go in a house, we should wipe our feet, when loggers go in a store, they should switch footwear if their boots are spiked. If gravel is spilled on a sidewalk, it should be swept.
Ethics follows consideration and common sense. And ethical work in a workplace includes keeping as much of what remains undamaged and tidy.
So why is it that most tree services I know of - even some "hacks" - don't bruise up the buildings, but quite a few contractors I watch develop property, batter and scar the trees and limbs?
Everything has to have a reason. And every habit manifests a character trait.
What does this mean to you?
Why are arborists frequently called in to prescribe protection zones for trees, but I have yet to see a contractor called in to prescribe a protection zone for a builiding where tree work will be done?
Last edited: