treemandan
Tree Freak
My guess is that, like everything else, they do.
I've prayed about it and the word back is evolution is a lie created by Satan worshiping scientist trying to disprove god.
Yes and no. A species will never become a different species, but adpatation within a species is constantly occuring.
Yes and no. A species will never become a different species, but adpatation within a species is constantly occuring.
If I remember right it all started with plankton and then all hell broke loose.
Yes, he is always trying to steal the secret recipe for the crab patties.
Haa ha haa haaaa haha!
I ahve Botany text with pics and description of prehistoric trees. Some resemble giant Horse tail and others like giant Aloe vera.
Evolution can happen quickly or in micros.
Cool to think about trees in 100's of thousands of years from now.
I like to think they will be able to talk in a language we can understand.
"What do you say friend?" Tree says " feelin a bit nutty!":msp_biggrin:
Cheers and thanks for provoking some cool thoughts!:wink2:
First post, I mostly lurk, but I couldn't just ignore this.
Of course trees evolve, just like every other living organism. And contrary to the "debate", evolution is fact-not theory. You can watch organisms evolve in a petri dish. If you doubt this, go ahead and try last year's flu vaccine. It is disgraceful that this is perceived as a debate.
Natural selection / artificial selection / sexual selection / lateral gene transfer are the explanations (technically termed a hypothesis, though theory is also a decent word to use) that seeks to explain how the observed fact (evolution) occurs. If you don't believe that one of these hypothesis is correct, then you have to come up with an explanation that accounts for all that these do and then some.
Another example:
Things fall if you drop them. This is an observable fact. We hypothesize that gravity is the mechanism that causes this, and it works by yada yada yada. In other words, gravity is a theory.
There is a difference between a hypothesis and a theory, but they are used interchangeably in a colloquial context.
Back to lurking...
First post, I mostly lurk, but I couldn't just ignore this.
Of course trees evolve, just like every other living organism. And contrary to the "debate", evolution is fact-not theory. You can watch organisms evolve in a petri dish. If you doubt this, go ahead and try last year's flu vaccine. It is disgraceful that this is perceived as a debate.
Natural selection / artificial selection / sexual selection / lateral gene transfer are the explanations (technically termed a hypothesis, though theory is also a decent word to use) that seeks to explain how the observed fact (evolution) occurs. If you don't believe that one of these hypothesis is correct, then you have to come up with an explanation that accounts for all that these do and then some.
Another example:
Things fall if you drop them. This is an observable fact. We hypothesize that gravity is the mechanism that causes this, and it works by yada yada yada. In other words, gravity is a theory.
There is a difference between a hypothesis and a theory, but they are used interchangeably in a colloquial context.
Back to lurking...
Devilution becomes you.
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it”
Max Planck
Enter your email address to join: