Dolmar 133 Value???

[parrisw]

I'm looking at picking up a Dolmar 133, haven't seen it, missing clutch cover, he says it has good compression. By the pics it looks to be in ok shape.

 

[spacemule]

About 4 years ago, I sold a 133 parts saw for $200. No idea what current value is. Keep in mind that it's the same frame as the 143 saw, so you've got all the weight without the cc's of the bigger saw. Kind of like the 6400 or the 7300 compared to the 7900.

 

[parrisw]

About 4 years ago, I sold a 133 parts saw for $200. No idea what current value is. Keep in mind that it's the same frame as the 143 saw, so you've got all the weight without the cc's of the bigger saw. Kind of like the 6400 or the 7300 compared to the 7900.

Cool thanks.

 

[PB]

Just an FYI, I have a source that had some 133 Tecomec P&C's for about $40 if you ever needed one.

 

[Hddnis]

I recently got a running 143 with 36 bar and several good chains for $100. Seen others around here going for $450.00
133's seen to get about $300.00 or a little more if really nice with a good bar.

My 143 was an ugly saw as far as dirt and grime. It sits on the shelf waiting its turn on the magic bench where the fountain of saw youth will breath new life into it.



Mr. HE

 

[cuttinscott]

A standard Sachs Dolmar 133 does not really hold much Value, The sought after model is the 133 super which had a better ignition and Roller bearing Clutch Side vs the lighter ball bearing that the std 133. The standard version had many failures. The reason for all the 133 bearing failures was users taking the rakers much too low and putting too much stress on the rs case and bearing. Also the 133 super had better air filtration.

Scott

 

[parrisw]

Just an FYI, I have a source that had some 133 Tecomec P&C's for about $40 if you ever needed one.

Thanks I'll let ya know.

Thanks again everybody, we'll see what happens.

 

[nolids]

A standard Sachs Dolmar 133 does not really hold much Value, The sought after model is the 133 super which had a better ignition and Roller bearing Clutch Side vs the lighter ball bearing that the std 133. The standard version had many failures. The reason for all the 133 bearing failures was users taking the rakers much too low and putting too much stress on the rs case and bearing. Also the 133 super had better air filtration.

Scott

False information here. The 123 is the saw that used the ball bearing on the start side, not the 133. The 133, 133s, and 143 had roller bearings on both sides of the crankshaft The 133 is a stout saw.

 

[cus_deluxe]

wow 10 year old thread here lol.