Fasciation Street Trees - Virtually All. Guesses ??

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

M.D. Vaden

vadenphotography.com
Joined
Oct 31, 2002
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
640
Location
Beaverton, Oregon
While providing an estimate in Tualatin, Oregon, today, I noticed the top of a relatively young street tree.

Probably 5 years in the ground.

It's top was Fasciated.

Then I noticed that practically every other street tree in sight had the same thing. One, two, three - up to maybe 8 - fasciated tips.

Columnar street trees. Maple, don't know the variety. Very tight form - lot's of codominance and included bark. All trunks 5" DBH and less.

I can't remember the last time I saw fasciation on a maple tree. Sometimes cherry and Forsythia. But never seen it on so many consecutive plants.

Anyone have a guess as to why so many maples would have that?

Think it might be related to tree cuttings or tissue all being from one parent plant?

It does not look too damaging yet. I'm just curious, having never seen such proliferation of this before.
 
I wish you had pictures. That would indeed be interesting to see. One comment I read on Dr. T. Ombrello's Plant of the Week page at UCC Biology Dept says "fasciation has been induced experimentally by applications of plant hormones"...

What have they been applying over there??

Sylvia
 
Any chance of you being able to get some pics? I'd like to see the trees as well.

It might be days or weeks until I get back out that way.

But I have a photo that shows similar fasciation. This photo is from a flowering cherry tree. I put arrows pointing to the fasciation on it resembling what the maples have.

The maple's fasciation don't have the full curls like the cherry twig, but do have the flattened club-like ends.

I plan to go back out to the maples, because I want to get some pics for future refererence.

The maples look rather normal, except for a few of these flattened distorted twigs on top. They do have a bit of twist and curve, just not as severe as the photo from the flowering cherry.

attachment.php
 
Last edited:
Strange. I've seen it on forsythia as well, and perhaps come across it in other ornamentals, but never a hardwood tree as far as I know.
 
It does not look too damaging yet. I'm just curious, having never seen such proliferation of this before.
Why do you call it damaging? Look up cristata--fasciation is a highly desirable ornamental characteristic. :cheers:
 
fasciation has been induced experimentally by applications of plant hormones"

I've seen it along with the horizontal leaf venation caused by herbicidal misapplication.

I've also seen a lot of tillia cordata with asymmetrical stem and branch growth that cannot be attributed to reaction.
 
Fascinating.

And where is this damage you speak of, sir?

:confused:

With columnar street trees loaded with codominance and included bark, plus fasciations on main apical points ...

Form your own conclusion I supppose.

My guess is a mutated specimen has been clonally propagated.

Mentioned the trees to the City of Tualatin parks / operations man this afternoon. His guess was similar to yours.

attachment.php
 
Last edited:
Wow.

What physical properties do the fasciations possess? Included bark? Weak crotches? Just generally weak branch attachments/wood? Never really seen them so prolifically, usually just the isolated branch here and there, so not much experience with their characteristics, especially in trees.
 
Wow.

What physical properties do the fasciations possess? Included bark? Weak crotches? Just generally weak branch attachments/wood? Never really seen them so prolifically, usually just the isolated branch here and there, so not much experience with their characteristics, especially in trees.


Seem more like deformity. I have not seen many in the past cause included bark.

In this case, they are stunting quite a few apical tips and affecting the structure.
 
I am going to vote for bacterial infection or Inherited trait. I have seen this in similar varieties of Acer around town. I also consider potential chemical exposure in some places.
 
With columnar street trees loaded with codominance and included bark, plus fasciations on main apical points ...
Sounds self-contradictory. Codominance is a problem, true, but that fasciation is correcting that problem by subordinating the codoms...without pruning! :clap:

I think the mutation is positive, tending toward self-preservation.

"I have not seen many in the past cause included bark."

Now I'm really confused. Which of the fasciations is causing included bark in a fork sizable enough to worry about splitting?

Please show me the damage. :monkey:
 
Last edited:
This may be nothing and I'm not a tree guy, but i have books I use to identify and learn. 4 years ago on the canadian side of Niagara falls I noticed the maple seeds did not look quite like what I'm used to. I found out that they were Norwegian maples if memory serves I believe there was a sign there that said they planted these maples because they have a greater resistance to ground levels of automobile pollution levels than do the native maples. Considering what 2-4D does to things when topically applied maybe pollution can also have these effects on your maples. Longshot but I thought I'd throw that out there.
 
Sounds self-contradictory. Codominance is a problem, true, but that fasciation is correcting that problem by subordinating the codoms...without pruning! :clap:

Well if you figured out the intent of the first post "does not look too damaging yet" you wouldn't have had to type as much.
 
Last edited:
Any chance that Cambistat (or other gibberellin inhibitor) could be involved here? Otherwise, I'm inclined to go with Big Jake and his 2-4D pollution as a possibility.
 
I'd take cuttings and graft them to see if they will propagate true and maintain the characteristic.

Off the cuff I would say not, because some of the pictures have normal twigs coming out of faciated stems. I'm inclined to say a mite problem or abiotic exposure.

If it did hold true to form, you would get some real cool tormented cvs.


Fasciation: A weird plant deformity
Steven Gower
MSU Diagnostic Services

We occasionally have plants submitted to the lab with a weird plant deformity known as fasciation. Fasciation is a term that describes the abnormal fusion and flattening of plant organs, usually stems, resulting in ribbon-like, coiled and contorted tissue.

A stem from autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata) was submitted with this abnormality. (view photo) Autumn olive is an invasive large and spreading shrub with leaves that are bright green above and silvery-green below. Stems and twigs are silvery to golden-brown. The stem end submitted was flattened, ribbed and coiled.

Although rare, fasciation has been observed on many woody and non-woody plants. It is believed to be caused by some sort of genetic mutation in the meristematic tissue. Other causes of fasciation can include bacterial infections, insect injury, chemical exposure or physical injury. Distorted tissue can be pruned out and growth will often revert back to normal. Plants with fasciation should not be propagated, as progeny may inherit the mutant trait.

Wayne Armstrong (http://waynesword.palomar.edu) likens them to galls.

Although their origin may vary considerably, fasciated stems may be an unusual gall-like structure caused by insects, mites or nematodes. Fasciations occur on a wide variety of plants in San Diego County, including sagebrush (Artemisia), chocolate lily (Fritillaria), evening primrose (Oenothera) and a tall roadside weed called mullein (Verbascum thapsus). It should be noted here that some fasciated stems may be a genetic malformation (as in certain cristate cacti). At this time the WAYNE'S WORD staff does not know the precise organism that caused the fasciation of our mugwort, but we are reasonably certain that it is not a genetic malformation.

For More Information About Galls:

* Armstrong, W.P. 1995. "To Be or Not to Be a Gall." Pacific Horticulture 56 (4): 39-45.


Here is a more in depth essay (discourse?) on causality, which explains the abundant budding on fasciated twigs

Refuge Notebook

Article

September 29, 2006

Mutations, disease, bugs, and chemicals can all amplify fireweed flowering
By: Ed Berg

Diane Owen and her husband Charlie operate the Russian River ferry in the summer and return to their home in Mississippi in the winter. Diane loves flowers and gardening, and was curious about an unusual fireweed plant she spotted growing near the Russian River this summer. She sent pictures of the flowers, and later the dried plant, to Refuge headquarters after it had gone to seed.

The profusion of flowers and leaves strikes the eye in the photos, but when you see the plant in the flesh, you immediately notice the greatly flattened stem. The stem was round coming out of the ground, but higher up it broadens to about an inch wide and an eighth of an inch thick, like a fat ribbon.

I sent Dianne’s photos and a description of the plant to Pat Holloway, who is a professor of horticulture at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks. Pat said that this kind of flattened stem growth is called “fasciation.” She instructed me to do an internet Google image search on “fasciation,” which immediately provided dozens of pictures of this phenomenon in plant species such as delphiniums, euphorbias, forsythia, foxgloves, lilies, and primulas. Pat has observed this flattened growth once in fireweed, and more frequently in delphiniums, lilacs, and in her son’s cactus collection.

The term “fasciation” comes from the Latin word for band or bandage. In anatomy, a “fascia” is a flat, fibrous band of connective tissue that holds muscles and internal organs in place.

To see how this growth form gets started, it is important to know that plants grow upward from the tip (or apex) of the stem, unlike animals, which grow in all directions. The growing zone is called the apical meristem, and it is typically housed in a bud at the top of the stem or the end of a branch. The meristem itself is dome-shaped nub of rapidly dividing cells. The cells at the bottom of the nub soon specialize and form the various tissues of the young stem, such as xylem and phloem for conducting water and food, or fibrous tissues for support. The cells the top of the nub continue dividing, making new cells and replenishing the unspecialized, dividing cells. Thus the stem grows upward and taller.

Occasionally, however, normal cell division in the meristem gets derailed, and several competing zones of cell division occur within the meristem, as if the plant was trying to create several stems simultaneously side-by-side. This produces a widening of the stem, since the stem is now composed of several sub-stems, each with it own would-be meristem at the top.

The apical meristem in a plant controls the number of leaves and flowers on the stem. It normally does this by releasing an anti-branching hormone which severely limits the number of lateral shoots that a stem can produce. This is why gardeners prune off the apical meristems (i.e., the tips) of shrubs when they want shrubs to produce a lot of lateral branches and have a “bushy” look. All gardeners understand this phenomenon of “apical dominance,” even if they are unfamiliar its scientific name.

When fasciation compounds a simple meristem into multiple growing centers, each center looses some of its dominance and the stem produces many more leaves and flowers than it would with a single strongly dominant apical meristem. Hence the bushy look of this Russian River fireweed.

When I first saw Dianne’s fireweed photos, I immediately thought of genetic mutation. Most of our common domestic flowers are mutations from usually smaller or less showy wild flowers. For centuries gardeners and horticulturists have been propagating the mutations that they like, and in time the favored mutations appear in our nurseries and seed catalogues. Nature of course works in similar fashion, but selects only the mutants that have traits that make them more competitive in the struggle for survival.

In some cases fasciation is caused by a genetic mutation in a cell of the meristem, and this mutation may or may not be reproduced in the offspring. More commonly, however, fasciation is caused by a disease or an insect or mite that partially destroys the meristem. The bacterium Rhodococcus fascians, for example, causes fasciated growth in a variety of ornamental and landscape plants such as chrysanthemums, impatiens, and daisies, and is a commercially important plant disease. Many plant viruses also are known to cause fasciation.

Fasciation can also be caused by chemicals, such as pesticides or plant growth hormones like cytokinin, as well as by mechanical damage such frost. It can occur anywhere the plant is growing through cell division, such as in a flower head, root, or fruit, as well as a stem.

The Russian River fireweed grew from a well-developed underground stem (rhizome), so it was probably one member of a patch of genetically identical clones. The fact that only one plant showed fasciation argues somewhat against a disease explanation in this case, as bacteria or a virus would probably have infected more than one plant. If it is a mutation, the seedling offspring may or may not show the trait. If for example the mutated gene is recessive, and the plant did not self-pollinate, then the seeds would be fertilized by nearby normal plants with dominant genes, and the offspring would all be normal, even though they carried the mutant recessive gene. If the plant did fertilize some of its own seeds, then some of these seeds could have two recessive genes and produce fasciated plants. If the mutation was a dominant gene, which is unlikely, then all the offspring would be fasciated.

We are going to plant some seeds, and also a piece of the rhizome, to see if we can recreate this growth form anew next spring. It is somewhat of a long shot, because most of the time fasciation is not caused by genetic mutation and it disappears after the present generation. But who knows, maybe in a few years, you will open up your seed catalogue, and here will be the Russian River Giant fireweed awaiting your green thumb!
 
Last edited:
Well if you figured out the intent of the first post "does not look too damaging yet" you wouldn't have had to type as much.
And what hidden meaning is there in that phrase? It clearly says they are damaging, and may cause more later. Then you say that they cause codominance. But your pics show that the fasciation cures codominance, through mutational subordination.

Stop wriggling and come clean, Mario--why do you keep saying that fasciation is damaging?? Or would you like to take that back? :popcorn:

Hey someone's gotta see Nature doing the right thing here, instead of seeing problems in everything that does not look "normal" to us.
 
And what hidden meaning is there in that phrase? It clearly says they are damaging, and may cause more later. Then you say that they cause codominance. But your pics show that the fasciation cures codominance, through mutational subordination.

Oh ... is that where you were ...

You thought I said that the fasciations cause codominance - connected dots that are not connected.

But I think I see what part you were referring to.

Even the trees 2 blocks away without the fasciations are codominant with included bark. I was simply describing the basic form of the trees.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top