monk680 said:sugar/hard maple has the same btu as red oak according to http://www.chimneysweeponline.com/howood.htm
ShoerFast said:Sugar Maple I think is one of the easest woods to split, good hot coal wood. But I wouldent walk too far down a hill for a soft maple, but it beats out a couple trees
http://mb-soft.com/juca/print/firewood.html
JUDGE1162 said:What are you burning now that you would turn up your nose at maple?
Unless you are drowning in hickory, beech or oak and since hickory can be a PIA to split compared to Maple
Dale said:Is it worth burning hard/soft maple in a woodburner. I know the btu's aren't that high, but wondering if I should even go through the cutting/splitting/ and worst of all stacking work.
Dale said:Judge1162, I primarily burn Elm, Locust, and Cherry. Nothing smells as perty as Black Cherry, and nothing I've found burns hotter than Elm or Locust. Gotta watch the temp when they get to rippin.
wdchuck said:I've gone through probably, 8 full cords of silver soft maple since we've been heating with wood, it's nice for day and fall/spring, we save the oak, locust, hickory for the bedtime load, but the silver maple has real nice coaling properties. And it's not so heavy.
Dale said:Is it worth burning hard/soft maple in a woodburner. I know the btu's aren't that high, but wondering if I should even go through the cutting/splitting/ and worst of all stacking work.
JUDGE1162 said:Yeah I had one of my apple trees break a large limb in a storm so I cut it up for firewood, boy was that nice, but now I wish I would have saved it for the fireplace vs the wood stove, it did smell good while it burned but in the woodstoe did not get to smell it unless I opened the door to add wood. I am sure that would have been nice in the fireplace.
Not much if any hickory on my land so I stick to Oak, elm and hard maple with a few others thrown in if I have them.
Enter your email address to join: