user 110938
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2013
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
I am a recent homeowner of a house previously owned by my parents about 30 miles north of Seattle, Wa. There are some mature Western Red Cedars on the acre lot that are dying. I desperately want to save them.
I hired an arborist (he charged $150, is that about normal?) to come look at the trees and tell me why they are dying/ how i can save them. He said the combination of nitrogen loaded soil and that the underbrush is killing the trees. The brush is a mix of himalayan blackberry, Reed canarygrass (I think), and a couple small red alder. The reason he claims nitrogen loaded is because there is an area adjacent to the trees that collects water from the region and doesn't really drain (forms a puddle pretty much all year except july-sept), and also from the alders in the area. He said removing the understory weeds and planting some non-invasive shrubs will save the trees.
The trees are fully exposed to sun, and sit on a berm a few feet above the area where water collects on the property. The area has always been wet, but should be less wet due to a 3 foot deep drain ditch with river gravel that was added about 15 years ago (about 15 yards from the trees) through this puddle. This is the only modification to the area in the last 15 years that I know of.
The trees are significantly chlorotic and have dead tops. The worse condition tree has about 1/5 of the tree length dead at top. Also, recently a large big leaf maple that was adjacent to these cedars died and fell. Two more large big leaf maples very near by are also dying.
Was the advise from the arborist most likely correct? Is there anything else I can do to improve my chances of saving these trees?
Thanks,
Blake
I hired an arborist (he charged $150, is that about normal?) to come look at the trees and tell me why they are dying/ how i can save them. He said the combination of nitrogen loaded soil and that the underbrush is killing the trees. The brush is a mix of himalayan blackberry, Reed canarygrass (I think), and a couple small red alder. The reason he claims nitrogen loaded is because there is an area adjacent to the trees that collects water from the region and doesn't really drain (forms a puddle pretty much all year except july-sept), and also from the alders in the area. He said removing the understory weeds and planting some non-invasive shrubs will save the trees.
The trees are fully exposed to sun, and sit on a berm a few feet above the area where water collects on the property. The area has always been wet, but should be less wet due to a 3 foot deep drain ditch with river gravel that was added about 15 years ago (about 15 yards from the trees) through this puddle. This is the only modification to the area in the last 15 years that I know of.
The trees are significantly chlorotic and have dead tops. The worse condition tree has about 1/5 of the tree length dead at top. Also, recently a large big leaf maple that was adjacent to these cedars died and fell. Two more large big leaf maples very near by are also dying.
Was the advise from the arborist most likely correct? Is there anything else I can do to improve my chances of saving these trees?
Thanks,
Blake