Hi all. EAB has hit Minneasota and suprised me and many others. I've been asked to treat un infected ash trees to prevent infestation. I've read about Xytect mostly and it looks like a good place to start.
Questions:
Xytect 2F or 75WSP?
I use another formulation of Imidacloprid. I prefer 2F flavor - it is easier to measure the amount as I do soil drench and mix for each individual tree.
Can I rig a lawn spray rig 300 gallon for soil injection use?
If not, what is the minimum equipment?
Best results (all similar success rates...) have come from basal drench of imidacloprid, trunk injection of imidacloprid, and trunk injection of tree-age. None of that requires much equipment. I use the spray rig tank to haul water around... Soil injection is less effective than simply digging a small trench around the base of a tree and pouring the stuff in it. I am biased against drilling holes into a tree every year (or every other year) for perpetuity.
Edit to add: forgot to mention Safari. I think this is a great option for smaller trees with smooth/thin bark. Once the bark starts to get thick, you are going to have less getting through...
Also wanted to add: whatever you use go with the maximum labeled rate.
One more edit: Dan Herms of OSU recommended treating trees over 15" dbh twice if you are using imidacloprid soil drench.
Pesticide license is required I imagine?
I work in a different state, but I think that is a pretty safe assumption that you need a license. You will also likely need specific insurance.
Any that last more than a year?
Tree-age lasts 2 years. It is MUCH more expensive and I am not a fan beacause you have to injure the tree every other year to treat it.
One site has around a hundred ash, all in good condition from 4" to 20". I would treat all if were mine. They want to treat only half maybe to keep cost down. Seems foolish to me. Which would you treat?
Seems foolish to me to treat that many trees on a single site. And likely illegal --- most insecticides are going to have a maximum pounds of active ingerdient per acre. You can'd do that many trees and stay legal unless you are talking about a huge site. One work around could be to treat some trees with one chemical and others with another chemical. The reason I say it seems foolish to treat that many is because chances are there are a lot of trees that are in bad shape with or without EAB. Look at the big picture. "Is this tree worth investing $1000 over the next several years." Treat the best remove/replace the rest. Not knowing the site...but I'd try to find as many as possible to find for removal and only treat the ones that are really worth saving. Maybe start with 50ish. Plant 60-70 new trees with the intention of removing another 20ish of the ash as the new trees get some size to them over the next 10-15 years. So at the end of the day, plan on really keeping 20ish trees for the long-term.
Thanks in advance,
Jamie