Husky 257 ?
- Thread starter Cut4fun
- Start date
Help Support Arborist Forum:
Our "INFORMATION COLLECTOR" will be back Sunday .He and his wife went up to their cabin. Hope they are having a good time.
The 257 is rated for 13500 rpm wot and the 357XP is rated for 14000 rpm wot.
Hired Gun
ArboristSite Operative
Some quick differences: 357 clip on type air box, side chain tensioner. 257 screw on top cover, front chain tensioner.
First the 257 is completely different from 357.The 257 had a different crankcase,cyl(open ports),oil pump,shocks,etc.The 357 has a new everything,including a quad port cyl,spring shocks instead of rubber,quick removal top cover,different clutch with 3 springs instead of two,a rubber intake flange instead of a fiber block,etc.Its a much better saw than 257,i should say better performing saw than 257,smoother and much snappier throttle response than 257.
buck futter
ArboristSite Guru
357!
The 357 is definately way ahead, but if you wanted a saw that size and could get a good deal on it, I don't think it is horrible. as far as open vs closed I don't think I would let that be the only deciding factor, case in point the ms200t and the husky 268, I think the open ported 268 has a lot of potential the reason for the slight derate from the 268xp is a smaller intake width. Open port pistons have other advantages as well. This is my opinion and I can back my thoughts but I will also say that I am sure people have a preference for closed port for a reason. I think some of the reasons can be negated if porting is brought into the picture.
jmo
buck
The 357 is definately way ahead, but if you wanted a saw that size and could get a good deal on it, I don't think it is horrible. as far as open vs closed I don't think I would let that be the only deciding factor, case in point the ms200t and the husky 268, I think the open ported 268 has a lot of potential the reason for the slight derate from the 268xp is a smaller intake width. Open port pistons have other advantages as well. This is my opinion and I can back my thoughts but I will also say that I am sure people have a preference for closed port for a reason. I think some of the reasons can be negated if porting is brought into the picture.
jmo
buck
SawTroll
Information Collector
Right on, I believe - they belong to two totally different generation of saws, and are not really comparative, except the they are about the same size.HiOctane said:
I am not sure that the 257 has an open-port cylinder, though.....
The 257 belong to the 154-family (154se, 254, 262xp, 254xp, 257 and 261), while the 357xp, 359 and the (short-lived I believe) 355 is a newer family of saws.
The 357xp replaced the 254xp, and the 359 replaced rne 257.
Last edited:
Similar threads
