I beg to differ
While I don't tend to find myself pollarding, pleaching or hedging on a regular basis, I would imagine that many a skilled, and educated gardner would take offense to certain comments in this thread, the process of hedging and maintaining broadleaf trees is an art. We as arborists, working to maitain the optimal health of trees may frown upon the action, but condsider if you will some of the alternatives, (a million dwarf crabs...) Learn to enjoy, or at least appreciate the architectural content, etc. Anyone who has spent time touring the gardens of Europe will agree I'm sure.
Ponder for a moment as well when you critique that only a few years ago we(the proverbial arborist, somewhat educated, somewhat not) were over thining trees half to death. (now we know that thinning does not encourage plant development, it in fact slows it) and before that we filled things with concrete, and bound them up with chains. I find we fa to often jump to conclusions and point fingers at 'mistakes' in the landscape, or pass things of as 'the low bidder's job'
As a graduate of the Niagara Parks Commission School of Horticulture, I spent many hours maintaining an 65 yr old Beech ( Fagus sylvatica) hedge, this hedge surrounded several gardens. While it was sheared twice a year, every 2 years it was hand puned with secatures to remove stubs and large wood, essentially pollarding it on a 2 year cycle.
I can't say for sure that this is what is happening here, but I just wanted to play devils advocate and perhaps open up some thoughts regarding this issue. No this is not GOOD arboriculture, but mankind has been pruning and manipulating plants for centuries as art, and in this case the manipulation will not cause a hazzard (such as topping)
To me this is like ones distaste for a particular form of architecture, Just because you don't like Frank Loyld Wright, doesn't mean you can't appreciate Falling Water
My two cents