alderman
Addicted to ArboristSite
Got some wood split this afternoon. A combo of Fir and Alder. No way could I do this much in one session without the splitter.
I'm way faster with an axe or maul than I am with a splitter, but then I'm sore for 3 days afterward.
I've said it before:If splitting with a maul or axe,I'll run out of gas LONG before the splitter does!Splitter vs. axe/maul isn't about speed - it's about long term body preservation. And mine is getting to where it could use all the help it can get.
Splitter vs. axe/maul isn't about speed - it's about long term body preservation. And mine is getting to where it could use all the help it can get.
Some wood just doesn't split with mauls, ax or wedges.I agree, but it's a trade-off. Splitters are great tools, but with an axe or a maul you get an aerobic workout. A splitter doesn't give you that. I split about 12-15 cords every year with my splitting maul, but I certainly don't recommend that for everyone. Personally, I enjoy it immensely. I have an excellent lightweight splitting maul that is a joy to use (Gransfors Bruks splitting maul), and I use a technique that requires little bending and almost no lifting.
I'll purchase a splitter in the next few years, but mostly because I want to split longer pieces of wood for my syrup cooker. Ideally 30-36". Splitting that stuff by hand is pretty tough. Also, I'm hoping to make more syrup every year, which will require a lot of wood.
My point isn't that anyone is wrong for using a splitter, just that using a maul has merits too.
Some wood just doesn't split with mauls, ax or wedges.