look the link http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/hsl_pdf/2004/hsl0413.pdf
and try to puzzle which saws were a,b,c,d,e
v.
and try to puzzle which saws were a,b,c,d,e
v.
puzzle
- Thread starter pinus
- Start date
Help Support Arborist Forum:
Max
ArboristSite Operative
52 pages..Oh my.
SawTroll
Information Collector
ANNEX A in that document seems to be littered with misprints, so I would say that only saws B (357xp) and E (MS200T) is possible to identify, based on that annex. Saw D is probably MS260, but stated guide bar length is obviously not correct.
Saw A is neither 346xp, nor 345 based on the stated data - maybe it could be the old 246, but I don't really think so. A number of misprints?
The weight and engine size fits 346xp, but nothing else. Engine size only fits the 345.
Saw C could have been MS270, but stated weight is far too low.
SawTroll said:
Saw D is probably MS260, but stated guide bar length is obviously not correct.
Saw A is neither 346xp, nor 345 based on the stated data - maybe it could be the old 246, but I don't really think so. A number of misprints?
The weight and engine size fits 346xp, but nothing else. Engine size only fits the 345.
Saw C could have been MS270, but stated weight is far too low.
I believe that I foun all ( saws from four different companies)
SawTroll
Information Collector
As I recall, the report stated that A anb B were Huskys, and the others were Stihl.....
......but who really cares?
......but who really cares?
