If you remove larger lower limbs on a mature tree (as shown in the video in the link), are you not reducing the live crown ratio??? Doing something like this purely for aesthetic considerations (and presumably a paycheque) should not be confused with "tree care", sympathetic or not!
You are quite right, that branch WAS removed for aesthetic reasons but I don't do such things lightly and please don't suggest that I am motivated by money. I most certainly AM motivated by lack of money but never so much that i will compromise my own principles and I have made a name around Cheshire by convincing a some enquirers that they and their tree needed no work whatsoever. Then they usually refer me with confidence (and surprisingly regularly), because they trust the advice that I give.
I like to leave trees with a form that encourages the client to look at it, enjoy it and treasure it all the more. I think this tree's form was wonderful before and I'm fiercely proud that I have pruned it, resolved strategic issues and it still looks wonderful.
Removing that low side branch has reduced conflicts with the neighbours and please remember that this job was prompted by the owner getting frequent requests from many of her neighbours to cut the tree down!
Now, the neighbours have almost universally acknowledged that the tree is an asset to them all and a wonderful thing to contemplate from their back gardens.
Yes, a large branch was removed, and that is no part of RVT, but there are absolutely no further changes planned to the structural elements in the future, so what you see is how this tree will look for as long as infrequent RVT's are continued.
This is a tree that had started to create tension between neighbours, now it doesn't.
Personally, I hope that sets the scene for this trees retention and appreciation for the longest term. I do need to get back to do a 1 year on photo as well and I will post a copy here.