UnityArborist
ArboristSite Member
Most single line ascents go like this:
1. One end of the rope is secured to the base of the tree
2. The free hanging line is then climbed
3. The climber lanyards in to the tree and calls for his ground guy the untie the rope.
The draw backs of this system is:
1. SRT produces more force on the branch than DRT
2. The climber has to wait for to be untied, and who knows where his ground crew has wondered off to.
Now I read in the Tree Climber Companion about securing the line directly to the branch using a Running Bowline. This requires the line being isolated more then in the other method, and there would be no 'back up' branches if the branch failed. I have used this a few times and it seems to work well in the right situation.
There are a few benefits:
1. The Climber does not have to wait for the ground crew to be untied
2. It is easy to set up in the tree if you were to return to the ground for lunch or whatever, and wanted to return to the same spot in the tree.
3. It would allow you to use more of your rope, almost 200' of a 200' rope instead of being limited to half.
4. In Oregon I have taken down Doug firs so big it took me 9 hours of cutting and rigging just to get the branches stripped and the top off. After a day like that a climber could tie off the rope and lower down the line. With the line tied off no one could pull it down and or steal it. It would also save the climber from having to spur up 150' the next day to finish the tree.
I want to know if any one else uses the running bowline for SRT, and if there is any info out there about the forces it puts on a branch: more or less than standard SRT, more or less than DRT.
1. One end of the rope is secured to the base of the tree
2. The free hanging line is then climbed
3. The climber lanyards in to the tree and calls for his ground guy the untie the rope.
The draw backs of this system is:
1. SRT produces more force on the branch than DRT
2. The climber has to wait for to be untied, and who knows where his ground crew has wondered off to.
Now I read in the Tree Climber Companion about securing the line directly to the branch using a Running Bowline. This requires the line being isolated more then in the other method, and there would be no 'back up' branches if the branch failed. I have used this a few times and it seems to work well in the right situation.
There are a few benefits:
1. The Climber does not have to wait for the ground crew to be untied
2. It is easy to set up in the tree if you were to return to the ground for lunch or whatever, and wanted to return to the same spot in the tree.
3. It would allow you to use more of your rope, almost 200' of a 200' rope instead of being limited to half.
4. In Oregon I have taken down Doug firs so big it took me 9 hours of cutting and rigging just to get the branches stripped and the top off. After a day like that a climber could tie off the rope and lower down the line. With the line tied off no one could pull it down and or steal it. It would also save the climber from having to spur up 150' the next day to finish the tree.
I want to know if any one else uses the running bowline for SRT, and if there is any info out there about the forces it puts on a branch: more or less than standard SRT, more or less than DRT.