This splitter deserves its own thread. A viable super split killer?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

KiwiBro

Mill 'em, nails be damned.
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
7,887
Reaction score
19,424
Location
Aotearoa
  • hydraulic yet very fast
  • adjustable 2/4-way wedge/s that seem well shaped
  • commercially made and seems well priced
  • has an optional fairly-priced conveyor
The optional R13 tyres should be standard. The 9t splitting force might not be enough in many situations.

 
That is about the speed of the splitter on my processor. I have a 5" cylinder though at 3200psi max. 30 something gpm pump.

My small splitter has ~11 sec cycle and it's almost laughable how slow it is in comparsion.
 
That is about the speed of the splitter on my processor. I have a 5" cylinder though at 3200psi max. 30 something gpm pump.

My small splitter has ~11 sec cycle and it's almost laughable how slow it is in comparsion.
I gather it's not a 13HP engine driving that pump of yours.

Would really like to see the splitter above in knotty/stringy wood. The wood in the video is splitting at the mere presence of a wedge. The wood here is considerably more belligerent.

Would happily pay more if they could step up to a bigger engine/pump/tank/cylinder combo if it could apply more force at the same cycle times as the current model, which appears to be the biggest in their line-up.
 
I gather it's not a 13HP engine driving that pump of yours.

Would really like to see the splitter above in knotty/stringy wood. The wood in the video is splitting at the mere presence of a wedge. The wood here is considerably more belligerent.

Would happily pay more if they could step up to a bigger engine/pump/tank/cylinder combo if it could apply more force at the same cycle times as the current model, which appears to be the biggest in their line-up.

35hp diesel.
 
  • hydraulic yet very fast
  • adjustable 2/4-way wedge/s that seem well shaped
  • commercially made and seems well priced
  • has an optional fairly-priced conveyor
The optional R13 tyres should be standard. The 9t splitting force might not be enough in many situations.


is there a link or picture to go with this thread, I aint seeing it

Funny the link shows up in my reply,
 
watched the video, not sure that hydraulic machine can outdo the Super Split, but it sure would give it a run for the money. I would really be interested to see what both machines could do with really tough stuff instead of that easy to split stuff. On the tuff stuff, my money would be on the hydraulics
 
That's a great splitter for doing large amounts of straight grained stuff however aspen is pretty easy to split. I doubt that could split elm of any size judging by how much it slows down in those couple of stringy pieces he does.
 
It seems to struggle upon hitting the wedge, then gets through it. Seems like it has the speed but not the power.
 
That adjustable wedge is pretty cool. Not sure, looks like he was splitting birch except for one piece with thick gnarly bark, but don't know either. Certainly fast enough. I think that slight hesitation on the bigger pieces was just the pump going to second stage. (is that what it is called?)
 
On the retract it seems to have two speeds. When the operator holds the lever forward it retracts fast. When he lets go it continues to retract but at a slower speed. I haven't seen that before on a splitter... How are they doing it?
 
What kind of KW are they running for the motor?



Mr. HE:cool:
 
electric: 7.5kW, 380V, from US$2400
gasoline: 13Hp Honda GX390, from US$2800

Prices ex works Russia.:D
 
If you want speed and power, just put a bigger pump on your current splitter. Just guessing at the size of the cylinder, I would say 3.5in which is comparable to some of the smaller hydraulic splitter already on the market. Dump enough oil in the system and you can get a 5in bore cyl to cycle as fast as the one in the video.

We had a 4in bore cyl, 2in shaft with a 8ft stroke that would cycle 13 times per minute. Getting speed isnt a problem if you really think you need it.
 
What's the conventional round length up there? Here it's about 12-16". A 3s cycle time splitting a single 16" long round (again and a-bloody-gain) is lousy compared to a 10s cycle time splitting 4 rounds at a time through a 'no need to touch this wood ever again' box wedge. Two different schools of thought, and when talking commercially available machines, two different costs. Horses for courses...and budgets.
 
If you want speed and power, just put a bigger pump on your current splitter. Just guessing at the size of the cylinder, I would say 3.5in which is comparable to some of the smaller hydraulic splitter already on the market. Dump enough oil in the system and you can get a 5in bore cyl to cycle as fast as the one in the video.

We had a 4in bore cyl, 2in shaft with a 8ft stroke that would cycle 13 times per minute. Getting speed isnt a problem if you really think you need it.
Fast, powerful or economical.... Choose any two. With hydraulic splitters their is always a compromise between how much $$, cycle time and tonnage.
 
Back
Top