Trash the Clove?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TheTreeSpyder

Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Dec 31, 2001
Messages
3,888
Reaction score
229
Location
Florida, USA
It has been suggested to throw away the clove hitch/ tautline assemblies. Especially, pointing out that it is irrational to teach new guys them. Partly, because they both (as a family) need stopper knots.

i guess some arguments could be made there!

But i am one that has always taught these to anyone interested in climbing, and this is why:

1)i think that the clove or double clove (tautline) is of a family of knots; that one can start off with and make more positively; for as you practice one, you practice the other; as you learn about the faults of one you learn about the other. There is a lot to learn; it has always seemed to me, so by learning common families of things helps to insure faster, more complete, positive progress. You can even fold into the rolling hitch, constrictors and distal; all from a base mastery and expense of just learning the clove +1 move very well. What a bargain!

2)Mastering the clove alone and all it can do for you, can get you out of a lot of situations; because of its flexability. It is called "The Mother of all Knots". Of course i look at this comprehensively and not just in a tree. You can tie a slipped clove, slipped constrictor; make a clove from a 'muenter' around an anchor, or undo it to that control point (muenter) while untying. If that was a bowline, or running bowline, untying/tying under tension, and adjusting, maintaining control; it would be quite a bit trickier. It is clean simplicity in its application and manufacture.

3)Virtually all open ended knots, especially in life support call for a stopper knot, especially after the evolution that brought us to nylon that is slipperier. The old hemp had hairs on it that would interlock, and help hold a knot; the more tension there was; the more the stiff hairs locked. i use a bowline without stopper knots directly; but i make it with 2 choking rings, and a 'yosemite tie off' that keeps the tail out of the eye. The extra choking ring and tie off on the tail secure it well i think; without the backup. But, a single bowline (the king of knots), calls for a stopper knot too. That is just knotting. Tom makes one, that is even more secure by a few degrees, but it lets the tail end up inside the eye; i am confident in the holding power and stay with the 'yosemite' end as in "On Rope". All knots, even stopper or 'backup' knots should have a tail on them >/= 4x the lines diameter for safety. We keep bright colored tape (diffrent colors for diffrent ends of the same line) that runs 2-4" up on the 1/2" lines; just leaving this outside the knot, marks it as safe.

4)i kind of let a newbie evolve, advance through the knots; mostly i used to do this in case they went some place else, talked up with some climbers or did personal research etc., they wouldn't be lost, they could confidentally and comfortably fit in and grow there too. That is changing as these new breed of things become more standard. But, still feel that with the utility of the clove, letting them taste diffrent ways, be things, to be able to get by without a seperate eye to eye tail, or no tail at all is good background and experience. i have learned and carried things from each evolution point. So i don't see any reason why a beginning /part time climber; can't climb with the simpler/ basic/complimenting stuff for 3-4 weeks, then show enough command and interest to advance to the next level. If they can't, that is self sorting! i think in the comprehensive sense; you are doing them a favor; if they end up following thru. But, that is probably when you have someone under your wing, and not when they are being sent to a climbing school.

Sometimes the scenic route, will give the most background!
 
A miss-tied blakes becomes a sue-i-slide knot. Malpractice in knotiing techniques can be hazard-us.

Throw nothing away. I still rig from a natural crotch from time to time too.
 
KC, isn't that like teaching a new driver bad habits first, then teaching him the best way to drive, after a few weeks?:confused:

I would teach him proprerly tied closed hitch for climbing, then when he is very expert at that, let him learn the knots that fall apart, and suicide knots.

I would much rather a new guy was sending down branches tied off with a running bowline and marlin knot, than an clove hitch without a stopper knot.

In this day and age of computers, color arborist catalooges, isa seminars, climbing videos, and other resources, nobody should climb on these outdated knots. If you want to know how to tie these as a novilty, to tie up your dog or something, that's great, but it's my opinion that a new climber shoud learn proper and safe techniques first.
 
Clove Hitch

Why would you trash the clove hitch. It's the strongest most sercure hitch you can tie..... Dosen't make good sense to eliminate it....
 
i've been waiting for someone else to speak, for i've seen the Clove's efficiency rated from 60-80%; covering about the same as a bowline 60-75%, +~5% for double bowline. An anchor bend on a spar 4"+ can run right on up to 90%, but could get difficult to untie, especially if unslipped and wet.

i think the running bowline has a more positive choking grip on its host (load)than a clove initially, but then the clove gets another grip. i like arraingements with 2 grabs, one that is about all it needs, and then another for eliminating any inital slip or doubt. That is why we tie all double bowlines, like loop slings and use a "half hitch running double bowline" on loads that we don't use loop runners on. They all grab twice, knot security to me is not just about the knot not coming out. So it brings me back to that quote "......You're going to war, always have a backup; 2 is 1 and 1 is none........" - DI in GI Jane.

i only use a running bowline without a 1/2 hitch first if setting from the ground, then make sure that some imperfection or branching positively dogs it on the light side of the load. A running bowline can be more comfortable to untie, becuase you can pick it up off the load and stand while untying it, unlike a clove.

i think that the absolute double choke of a 1/2 hitch, with an absolute choke of a running bowline on down the spar is going to be about as secure on the load and as far as slippage of the knot. Of course it must be TDS+Inspected properly; and the heavier end positively pulls both chokes closed by being after the bowline in the arraingement. For, i also look at the 1/2 hitch as taking the brunt of the pull, and then that reduced pull going to the bowline, making it even more secure, for it is being tested less. Though i started using that, thinking about it like an extended clove, for the only knot stats i saw at the time quoted a clove around 75, and bowline at 63; so i reasoned that i might be able to get the strength of a clove, with the security of this double choke effect.

Does anyone know about if a 1/2 hitch befor a running bowline would increase or decrease thae total knots strength? does it make an diffrence if it is hanging balanced, or - with one heavy end, whereby the hitch is pinching itself more?

This is like the newest tip in the candy store catalogue (do you have to ask?) in this years (2K2) issue 2x, pages: 2 and 22 (does that mean anything mystical or cryptic if i play it backwards 2x Sean?) of having an extra long eye on a sling, so that the main thrust of force isn't totally expressed on the 'joint' (knot). For years when ever hoisiting a retreivable redirect up over a limb, we always make a long eye on the bowline that holds the pulley. We do this so that both legs of the eye support the pulley, and the eye is long enough so that the knot is on the other side of the limb holding the araingement. In this way also, the strain is not on the knot totally; so i try to make a lot of varied arraingements with this principle.

i also always use the yosemite tie off for further security after the 2 choking rings in the bowline knot itself, and keep the eye clean for attatching to as in combining two pix in "on Rope". i find that using the slip knot method of tying a bowline lends itsef very well to this; just make 2 rings. And it kinda looks like a magic act, especially with 2 rings choking, yosemite tie off, tied behind my back. But, i tell the trainee, "that there is no real magic to it, because, my fingers never leave my hands"; as i am whipping out another one for him!


But beyond that, i must admit, that i have looked and investigated knots as an art itself, but don't really look at the vintage clove as a novelty. It is just too flexible; and leads and branches out to too many other knots. i think that knots are machines, and that understanding one that has as many branches is very powerful. One of the knots is a Distall, my favorite climbing and adjustable lanyard knot; but it requires a tail.

So for starting out, knowing how to use the most basic tools, without a tail in a pinch, or double tying with the end of your line; so you have that to fall back on; and it the clove also evolves to the distal for regular use. Also, constantly making really the same knot to start tautline and distal for climbing, clove for rigging, really is a powerful; way to go as far as as you practice one you practice the other if you know how they link. i think that does a lot for competance, speed and confidence; also examining their likes and diffrentiation. It is like a basic principle, to know well and simply to me.
 
Last edited:
My basics are still the tautline and clove with double half. Simple to tie and teach and can be tied one handed behind my back if I need to in a pinch. I show the students the Blake, Distal, MT, Swabish and others and let them decide which they will use. But if you work with me you better be able to untie a clove 90% of the time when the log hits the ground.
I never heard of tying a stopper 8 in the tail of a tautline until I started teaching. I have always tied my tautline, after I entered the tree and always close to my saddle with a long tail. Even though I often see it run out when students are hip thrusting and advancing it ahead of them, I have never in 35 years seen it work its way toward the end of the tail in use in the tree. Just lucky I guess.

Guess I am just old and set in my ways. That must be why the students outclimb me some days, can't be the 30+ yr difference in age.

Bob Underwood
 
Back
Top