When firefighters arrived, they were unable to rescue him because the tree was too close to power lines.
When firefighters arrived, they were unable to rescue him because regulations didn't permit them to work so close to power lines, even if that means sitting there watching somebody die, because making sure the department doesn't get sued is more important than anything else.
The officer in charge deserves big thanks. It is (or should be) the motto of everyone who is in a position to help-"what can hurt me or my guys." Fools rush in. I have worked thousands of hours around power. The training I got basically was this, in an emergency involving contact, let them burn, do not become a second victim. Mark is not stupid, he just doesn't understand. Better one funeral than two, or three or....BoesTreeService said:I don't know if you are ignorant, or just plain stupid. Firefighters would have had to attempt to rescue the man with an aerial device (ie. bucket truck) The tree trimmer may have not been able to use a truck to get into the tree - that could explain why he was climbing. It might have been that not only were the power lines "too close" but perhaps they were completely blocking the only access to the injured climber. Truth is you are attacking the fire department with out muddying the water with the basic facts. As a captain on an engine company, I am the initial command on many such rescue scenarios. I can tell you for sure, that the fire officer on scene will NEVER sit back because of regulations or procedures and watch someone whose life is in danger. I can also tell you that mine, and all fire officers FIRST responsibility is to keep his own crew alive. We are not much help to anyone if we get ourselves hurt. Those firemen didnt put that guy in the tree, they didnt anger the bees, they didnt run the power lines in front of the tree... It was not thier fault that the situation occured and yet they would still take any "calculated" risk, based on risk-benefit anaylysis (and remember the fire officer has only seconds to make that judgement. Obviously the fire officer decided that the danger to the victim did not justify the risk to his crew. You do not know exactly what danger the victim was in, nor what the risk to the firefighters you are berating was. The victim survived, they did not watch him die. I hope you arent the kind of person who has to berate everyone and everything they do. Especially without even knowing the specific facts, or having any type of knowledge at all of how they operate. That kind of person makes me sick. But Im sure if your house was to burn tonite, those very same firemen you jumped all over would rush in to search for you without a second thought.
Enter your email address to join: