I thought they disproved all the old theorys about the stradivarius's perfect sound. From what I know.....The wood was only one key point...(uniform growth rings from equal summer and winter growth). The other main point was the perfection in thickness throughout any of the parts (perfect control of thickness...by hand!!). The end result, I thought, was the perfect craftsmanship trumped any major affect the wood had on it. In other words....they made a perfect instrument...they didn't 'just' have some special wood that no one else could get. Other period instruments were made of very similar woods but without them being combined with the uniform body thickness (therefore not perfect), didn't produce perfection in sound. I remember them using a CT scanner and found the inside of the instruments to be as perfectly made as the outside. From memory, something like 0.005" variation in thickness on all the body panels, curved and bent and all.
I've never been to the Stradivarius museum. You guys do get around.
It wasn't so much the wood thickness that was uniform, it was the air volume of the instruments that was consistent. See here. http://blog.americanhistory.si.edu/...iolins-reveal-master-luthiers-techniques.html