Go back to the oil thread and re-read it.I don't recall, honestly. Must not have been very impressive.
For posterity how about you re post it?
Go back to the oil thread and re-read it.I don't recall, honestly. Must not have been very impressive.
For posterity how about you re post it?
Are you really suggesting thet thermodynamics has something to do with rheology? Pathetic!Thank for proving my point!
What's really pathetic is your autistic, old azz.Are you really suggesting thet thermodynamics has something to do with rheology? Pathetic!
I did. Not impressed in the least. A CE that specialty is simple mixers. If you were good at what you do you by your advanced age you would have been a senior VP or some such for years by now. Instead your a sporadically employed mixer donkey. The other thing is any CE worth a damn is working on large view process related items, not essentially doing the job of a ME.Go back to the oil thread and re-read it.
Walker. I like you really. But, take a pill. Jesus.I did. Not impressed in the least. A CE that specialty is simple mixers. If you were good at what you do you by your advanced age you would have been a senior VP or some such for years by now. Instead your a sporadically employed mixer donkey. The other thing is any CE worth a damn is working on large view process related items, not essentially doing the job of a ME.
Just diverting the attention from your ignorance rather than addressing the issue, I see.What's really pathetic is your autistic, old azz.
Fluid agitation is not at all simple. What I do involves mass transfer, heat transfer, fluid dynamics, rheology, shear, etc. My clients include large engineering firms, who do not have staff that are sufficiently knowledgeable to do the job internally, as well as many end users. As for being a VP, technical talent does not necessarily translate into managerial talent. I know myself well enough to know I would not perform well in a managerial position. If I had somehow been promoted to a VP, I would not have been happy in the job and would have likely failed at it. I have been content to excel at the technical and communication aspects of my career, and leave the managerial stuff to others.I did. Not impressed in the least. A CE that specialty is simple mixers. If you were good at what you do you by your advanced age you would have been a senior VP or some such for years by now. Instead your a sporadically employed mixer donkey. The other thing is any CE worth a damn is working on large view process related items, not essentially doing the job of a ME.
Fluid agitation is not at all simple. What I do involves mass transfer, heat transfer, fluid dynamics, rheology, shear, etc. My clients include large engineering firms, who do not have staff that are sufficiently knowledgeable to do the job internally, as well as many end users. As for being a VP, technical talent does not necessarily translate into managerial talent. I know myself well enough to know I would not perform well in a managerial position. If I had somehow been promoted to a VP, I would not have been happy in the job and would have likely failed at it. I have been content to excel at the technical and communication aspects of my career, and leave the managerial stuff to others.
No. Just stating the obvious, Greg.Just diverting the attention from your ignorance rather than addressing the issue, I see.
Enter your email address to join: