CoreyB
Addicted to ArboristSite
A buddy was helping me split some wood the other day. After about 4 hours of splitting with only mauls I made the comment that a wood splitter may not be a bad idea.
He said that it would be a wast of time that and money. To get a hydraulic splitter that would keep up would cost thousands and would not be much faster.
I am not getting any younger but I also don't mind swinging a maul.
In 8-10 hours we can go from standing tree to 3 - 4 court of wood stacked and covered.
What are your thoughts is the only thing a wood splitter saves you is some sweat?
He said that it would be a wast of time that and money. To get a hydraulic splitter that would keep up would cost thousands and would not be much faster.
I am not getting any younger but I also don't mind swinging a maul.
In 8-10 hours we can go from standing tree to 3 - 4 court of wood stacked and covered.
What are your thoughts is the only thing a wood splitter saves you is some sweat?