jdrunbike
New Member
Hello,
I've had a few tree companies come out to take a look at possible hazard trees on my lot and was hoping to get the "second" opinion from a few of the experts here! I understand there's somewhat of an ongoing debate between cabling vs. cutting down all together and I think I understand most of the trade-offs. That being said - I'd appreciate any comments on the pictures/questions below.
Thanks!
View attachment 263079
View attachment 263080
First up - a very large cedar that is about 6' wide at the base and splits into three trunks about 10-12' up. If the left half of the tree fell (from the point of view of the pictures), it would take out our house. We've had recommendations to either cable or cut down the whole thing. One person said the tree was "too big" to cable. Is there such a thing - a tree that is too big to cable? Also, if it is cabled and maintained properly, what typically happens in this if the cables fail or the tree cracks - do the cables still have a good chance of keeping the cabled part from falling completely down? We're stuck in the typical quandary of "we want to save the tree but we want to be safe."
View attachment 263083
Next - another cedar that splits into two trunks, though this one is smaller and the split is at ground level. The left one, as you can see (in the middle-right of the picture above), is leaning towards the house. What do you think?
Also visible in the picture above are two large doug firs with some mounding on the ground at their bases. They are a little farther away than the cedars above and the mounds are more of a brownish color compared to the green grass.
Here are a couple of closer pictures of the doug firs:
View attachment 263086
View attachment 263088
The folks that have come out have said that the trees appear healthy but there has been a little bit of disagreement on the mounding. The trees lean a tiny bit in the direction opposite of the mounds, which also means they are leaning away from the house. I think we would deadwood and windsail them, at a minimum, if they are not a threat to the house (and people inside).
We're having an independent arborist out soon but don't want to leave any stone un-turned and have had good luck with advice on forums in the past. Thanks for taking a look and chiming in...we appreciate any feedback!
I've had a few tree companies come out to take a look at possible hazard trees on my lot and was hoping to get the "second" opinion from a few of the experts here! I understand there's somewhat of an ongoing debate between cabling vs. cutting down all together and I think I understand most of the trade-offs. That being said - I'd appreciate any comments on the pictures/questions below.
Thanks!
View attachment 263079
View attachment 263080
First up - a very large cedar that is about 6' wide at the base and splits into three trunks about 10-12' up. If the left half of the tree fell (from the point of view of the pictures), it would take out our house. We've had recommendations to either cable or cut down the whole thing. One person said the tree was "too big" to cable. Is there such a thing - a tree that is too big to cable? Also, if it is cabled and maintained properly, what typically happens in this if the cables fail or the tree cracks - do the cables still have a good chance of keeping the cabled part from falling completely down? We're stuck in the typical quandary of "we want to save the tree but we want to be safe."
View attachment 263083
Next - another cedar that splits into two trunks, though this one is smaller and the split is at ground level. The left one, as you can see (in the middle-right of the picture above), is leaning towards the house. What do you think?
Also visible in the picture above are two large doug firs with some mounding on the ground at their bases. They are a little farther away than the cedars above and the mounds are more of a brownish color compared to the green grass.
Here are a couple of closer pictures of the doug firs:
View attachment 263086
View attachment 263088
The folks that have come out have said that the trees appear healthy but there has been a little bit of disagreement on the mounding. The trees lean a tiny bit in the direction opposite of the mounds, which also means they are leaning away from the house. I think we would deadwood and windsail them, at a minimum, if they are not a threat to the house (and people inside).
We're having an independent arborist out soon but don't want to leave any stone un-turned and have had good luck with advice on forums in the past. Thanks for taking a look and chiming in...we appreciate any feedback!