Here's a couple replies from the seller. BTW,what is the HP rating on the 200T and 191T.
"The MS200T is a little bit lighter than the 191 (1+lb more), and
surprisingly .3 bhp more. But the torque and stroke to me feel more
substantial in the 191. That might be why I can tell a difference
between the two, seemingly the 200 being the inferior saw. When I put
the two to wood, in my opinion, the 191 pulls better, even with the
.325 full chisel chain, while the 200T is fitted with the 3/8 picco.
They're both great saws."
"The MS200T bore is 40mm, like the 190/019. I have several of both. There is no comparison (though the 200 cost 2x more when they were both available). The 191 is like using...and I kid you not, a 290 with an over the top handle. The bore is the the same @ 46mm, and when you crank this saw, you almost need to strap that dude to the floor."
I'm pretty sure the 191t was a turd. He really wants to sell it to say all that stuff about it. If the 191t was so awesome Stihl wouldn't have needed to replace it with the 192t. My dealer has 2 on the shelf he just can't move...they just don't look or feel right, and the dealers say they are a nightmare to service
Enter your email address to join: