Some are quoting me as expert...please don't, as I'm not. I do have a 670 and 625, with the 670 sporting a 272xp jug and piston, carb, etc. I have some old Tilton parts lists and IPL for Jonsered and have had access to similar Husky pages...both list a bunch of part numbers for what are similar saws...266/268xp and 670. Some part numbers match between marques, some do not.
The early 625 and 670 models had the 2-piece coils but the later ones are the same as Husky. I don't know the whole story about the champ and super designation, but I think the super came about as a result of slow sales on the west coast when the 272 became available. Bee Tee sold the super for a couple of years before Tilton had them. The champ WAS the 670 towards the last...I think they were just capitalizing on the good reputation the saws earned. I don't know if the cylinders on the super were a little better or not..a tenth or two extra HP is pretty elusive out in the woods! I cant feel the diff. between the "new" 272/670 and the old!
Some of the west coast supers also had the high-capacity filter...both 630 and 670. It required a nylon elbow to turn the spigot upwards, and a hole routed in the cover. This filter was rare in the east and midwest, as it was problematic in the snow...I've only seen it on fire-dept saws here.
I *think* that elux spec'd out cylinders to at least two outsource companies...Mahle and Gilardoni, and this is where some of the odd part numbers come from. I have seen cylinders without a makers name as well, so maybe there were even more...
I have a 630 promised me, and have a junk 268 (non-xp) as well as brand new 268 non-xp) piston and cylinder. I think the crank bearings are bad in the 630, but the seals went bad in the 268, causing a burn-down. I'm hoping to have another bastid elux (red) saw.