gdn, that vid 338 vs 200T should be interesting. Now, about the 338's lifespan compared to a 200T, I've been swinging on pruning chainsaws down here longer than I care to admit, but if the 338 is anything like the 335's, the motor will last just as long as the 200T's - if not longer. The 335 motors' are as tough as they come, they can take an unbelievable thrashing and last for ages. Husky missed out big time on scoring a good share of the market when they brought out their 335's to 'combat' the stihl 020T's(200T) because the 200's were already fully sorted, while the new huskys had niggly design faults. The airfilters were sponge rubber and were clogged with oily debris/grungy mess constantly. They eventually upgraded to the still dodgy paper-thin fragile fabric filters they still use today.
They also had bad rubber manifolds that split easily due to bad design. They eventually upgraded to a solid manifold. The fuel tank breathers were and still are too stifled to breathe consistently. If all that wasn't bad enough, the switch wires were prone to breaking and shorting, the magnesium clutch cover is fragile and tends to break up, the muffler shoots hot gas onto your trigger hand, the fuel hose vibrates on a sharp edge and the plastic spark covers fall off ! All these faults are easy to fix permanently, but your average forest saws aren't wielded by expert chainsaw mechanics, so the 200T's still remain the No1 choice, even though the huskys are a smoother more comfortable saw to use. A couple of extra holes drilled in the muffler DOES improve power and low rev throttle response