Jim Timber
1/4 bubble off
Last spring (2011), I planted 100 DF's in an area with a relatively high water table as an experiment, and as a nursery site (it's black peat soil) with the intention of transplanting a third of them later on.
This summer, while my trees were recovering from root rot and transplant shock last year (trees were shipped 3 weeks before our ground was even exposed - couldn't plant them in ice), and generally bouncing back wonderfully; the powco came in and nuked the area with herbicide after agreeing to let me manage it as I was using it as a nursery... Ugh!
So now it's time to start moving these little guys out of harms way, and I'll let the powco mow their own sumac from here out, but I'm wondering about the trees that lost their needles again?
There's trees that look toast, but there were trees last year that bounced back which also looked toast in the fall. Anything from last year that didn't grow this spring got pulled already (it was crispy), so I have a smaller cull lot to wade through. Some of the trees that got nuked have put on another spurt of growth, so I know they'll be ok eventually. Some are harder to tell, as they're not dried out yet.
What I'm wondering: is it better to uproot all the trees I think will survive now, or should I try to let them go another year in the richer soil? I want to transplant them this fall when the days are too hot for decent hunting and I'm already committed to being at my land.
Also, given the amount of stress they've had, and how their roots generally suck anyway - should I cut the tops off and try to get them to resprout? I wonder about nutrient requirements, and sustaining the top with a weak root system. If I cut them back to a 6-10" stub, that would give them a lot more root mass per leader volume, but they wouldn't have any needles to gather light from. These are the ones with problems I'm referring too. The good looking 3' trees will be transplanted whole and left to resume a happier life deep in the woods out of harms way.
Hopefully this makes sense.
This summer, while my trees were recovering from root rot and transplant shock last year (trees were shipped 3 weeks before our ground was even exposed - couldn't plant them in ice), and generally bouncing back wonderfully; the powco came in and nuked the area with herbicide after agreeing to let me manage it as I was using it as a nursery... Ugh!
So now it's time to start moving these little guys out of harms way, and I'll let the powco mow their own sumac from here out, but I'm wondering about the trees that lost their needles again?
There's trees that look toast, but there were trees last year that bounced back which also looked toast in the fall. Anything from last year that didn't grow this spring got pulled already (it was crispy), so I have a smaller cull lot to wade through. Some of the trees that got nuked have put on another spurt of growth, so I know they'll be ok eventually. Some are harder to tell, as they're not dried out yet.
What I'm wondering: is it better to uproot all the trees I think will survive now, or should I try to let them go another year in the richer soil? I want to transplant them this fall when the days are too hot for decent hunting and I'm already committed to being at my land.
Also, given the amount of stress they've had, and how their roots generally suck anyway - should I cut the tops off and try to get them to resprout? I wonder about nutrient requirements, and sustaining the top with a weak root system. If I cut them back to a 6-10" stub, that would give them a lot more root mass per leader volume, but they wouldn't have any needles to gather light from. These are the ones with problems I'm referring too. The good looking 3' trees will be transplanted whole and left to resume a happier life deep in the woods out of harms way.
Hopefully this makes sense.