El Moobs
Are we there yet?
Did you time the ports or are these just visual observations? It would be interesting to know the results.
I've only ported maybe 10 262. Moobs would know more.
As for the intake port, I'd say it's tough for it to be wider because the threaded holes for the carb mounts are in the same place. Easy to grind through for sure. I've measured the intake port and found that's there is no need to widen it at all, I just drop the floor a bit. There is already more area to the inner port opening than the outer port opening or the 87 Venturi. The floor always winds up around 73-74 after the machine work on every jug I've done. Stock, all have been 71, no gasket.
Exhaust port, I've never noticed a difference. The piston has skirts a mile long. I can't remember if the piston crown drops below the exhaust port at BDC right now. I'm pretty sure it doesn't, because one could lower the floor if it did and I never was tempted to do so.
Everyone says that the KS transfers are wider and bigger than the Mahle. I'm not so sure if it's actually true or not. The KS jugs I've been around (all model including Stihl) are a harder and brighter/less staining aluminum alloy. Many times it looks like the ports are bigger, but the brightness of the alloy created an illusion for me. They were the same. The KS just stain less.
The only 262 I've been around that has very wide external transfer tunnels was the Mahle Decomp that I used in the Christmas saw. It needed to be clearanced externally to miss the flywheel.
Wish I had more for you guys. Pretty sure I have a Mahle decomp and a KS here that I can take pics of.
I've only seen a couple of 262XP jugs that were really different. I can't recall the real differences though Al.