USMC615
Wood's Tougher Than Woodpecker Lips...
A close friend of mine served on the Constellation. IIRC the last non nuke carrier in active service
I believe that's correct regarding the Constellation.
A close friend of mine served on the Constellation. IIRC the last non nuke carrier in active service
Yes, I was talking specifically comercial power generation not US defense. They have highly enriched (upper 90%) fuel that lasts decades unlike comercial plants (3-5%).Fossil fueled aircraft carriers had a range of around 12,000 miles. Nuclear carriers have unlimited range and 20-25 year refueling schedule. A slight difference.
Let me know the next time a 20 foot diameter 12 foot tall tank of gas can produce 1000 megawatts continuously for a year and then you refill it about 1/4 full and it is ready to go another year. Gasoline can't begin to come close to nuclear in the real world. Don't even get me started on how reliable "facts" are on Wikipedia.
Most reactors go 2 years not 1. Some are 18 month refuel cycles.
Fossil fueled aircraft carriers had a range of around 12,000 miles. Nuclear carriers have unlimited range and 20-25 year refueling schedule. A slight difference.
At least you're making real sense of the discussion...I've been on a few different nuclear-powered aircraft carriers in my Marine Corps yrs and aviation adventures.
A close friend of mine served on the Constellation. IIRC the last non nuke carrier in active service
I believe that's correct regarding the Constellation.
Yes, I was talking specifically comercial power generation not US defense. They have highly enriched (upper 90%) fuel that lasts decades unlike comercial plants (3-5%).
Don't believe we've ever covered nuclear power before in here lolHow is this for a derail?
Ask away, I'm quite familiar.Don't believe we've ever covered nuclear power before in here lol
This one is gonna go WAYYYY beyond my mental ability!
I am well aware of the limits of nuclear power. I held a senior operator license on 2 different commercial power plants during my career. The details of the fuel cycle vary a lot from plant to plant and I did operate one that normally went 2 years between refuels. Actually a one year refuel cycle is a more efficient use of the fuel but plant owners hate the down time to do the refuel that often even though it comes out cheaper in the long run. The fuel cycle used on any plant is custom designed to reflect the desired operating cycle while minimizing total costs. Some of the variables involved include initial enrichments, desired burn up at refueling, ability of the plant to easily vary power and desired power profiles. A typical BWR runs a slightly lower enrichment than a typical PWR due to the way each one controls the power levels and reactor core flux shapes.
c5rulz, you gotta love watching Slim Pickens ride the bomb.
IL has a few plants, which did you work at?I am well aware of the limits of nuclear power. I held a senior operator license on 2 different commercial power plants during my career. The details of the fuel cycle vary a lot from plant to plant and I did operate one that normally went 2 years between refuels. Actually a one year refuel cycle is a more efficient use of the fuel but plant owners hate the down time to do the refuel that often even though it comes out cheaper in the long run. The fuel cycle used on any plant is custom designed to reflect the desired operating cycle while minimizing total costs. Some of the variables involved include initial enrichments, desired burn up at refueling, ability of the plant to easily vary power and desired power profiles. A typical BWR runs a slightly lower enrichment than a typical PWR due to the way each one controls the power levels and reactor core flux shapes.
c5rulz, you gotta love watching Slim Pickens ride the bomb.
Most recently Clinton. Before that San Onofre in CA.
Looks like a BWR 4 control panel layout. Every generation has its own look.
What does this have to do with a 29 pound maul?
Most recently Clinton. Before that San Onofre in CA.