OK that makes sense. Mechanically stronger for less stretch and able to absorb more power. That aside, would a narrower kerf be more desirable as far as needing less power to cut and/or faster cut speed?
Ombesb said:What would be the upside of using 3/8 , hence a wider kerf??
Canyon Angler said:Now that the discussion has come around to this question: For my own 361, I'd like to occasionally use a 24" bar for bigger wood, and I was thinking .325" chain might be good for a 24" bar because the kerf wouldn't be as wide and it wouldn't tax the powerhead as much. But I see there are no 24" bars that take .325" chain. Is there any reason for this other than "nobody ever asked for it"?
Canyon Angler said:Now that the discussion has come around to this question: For my own 361, I'd like to occasionally use a 24" bar for bigger wood, and I was thinking .325" chain might be good for a 24" bar because the kerf wouldn't be as wide and it wouldn't tax the powerhead as much. But I see there are no 24" bars that take .325" chain. Is there any reason for this other than "nobody ever asked for it"?
Good choise, I believe!:biggrinbounce2:CaseyForrest said:Well, went back to the shop to get the correct rims.....No large spline .325 rims in 8 or 7 tooth, only 9 tooth.
So Im ditching the .325, and brought home a 16" ES bar and 2 RS chains.
.325 bar and chains are for sale on the trading post.
You will have to test it in the different types and sizes of wood that you plan to cut, to really know.Ombesb said:Can i jump in and hijack this thread for just a second? I am wondering what is the real world effective difference between .325 and 3/8? I dont' mean the mechanics of it. I understand 3pins divided by 2 and so on, I mean what is the difference in cutting. I have gathered that 3/8 is generally considered better at power and bar length goes up, but not sure why? Any help here.
Ombesb said:.... That aside, would a narrower kerf be more desirable as far as needing less power to cut and/or faster cut speed?
Enter your email address to join: