Boxeleder....
I'll agree to a point. Hard to dispute the science, especially when its proven. I grew up the same as many here where daddy cut and brought the firewood home. As I remember, daddy didn't do to much pre cutting and seasoning his wood. We cut 5 ft pulp wood year round, so when it came heating season, we would bring a load home and split it for the fireplace. We didn't have a wood stove. I remember the hard to start fires and heavy creosote build up in the chimney. Its a wonder Dad didn't burn the house down. I also remember when dad built the house I just sold. House built out of lumber we harvested our self. This was in 1984 and Its the first time dad had a actual wood stove. Dad almost did burn the house down with the wood stove. When I moved into the house in 1999, the first thing I did was get rid of the wood stove. After a winter of $300+ electric bills, my wife surprised me one Oct with a wood stove. I didn't have any wood to put in it, but my wife said I had a saw and a truck, get to work. The first winter, all my fire wood was freshly cut and split. Creosote was a big issue. It would accumulate so much so fast that it would actually clog up the screen on the chimney cap. I wasn't burning any pine at all, yet I was having a terrible creosote problem. The next winter wasn't much better, I had stored up some wood but it wasn't enough for the winter and it certainly wasn't fully seasoned. I continued with regular chimney cleaning a couple times each winter until I got a couple winters ahead with my wood supply. That's when the creosote problems mostly went away. Dry wood just burns cleaner. When it comes to pine, especially whitepine, I cut it and let it lay with the bark on for a year. The wood doesnt really dry, but the bark will loosen up and start falling off. At that point I will buck and split and then just leave in a pile until the next year. Pine will dry pretty fast once split and if put into a stack will dry enough to be burnt without any creosote problems. I don't make separate stacks for my firewood. When I stack it I usually push all the splits in a pile and then scoop the wood up with the loader and carry to the front of the shed. What ever wood is in the bucket is what gets stacked, so its pretty much mixed. When it comes time to carry the wood into the house, I pickup the first stick of wood my hand falls on, it doesn't matter if its pine, oak, dogwood, popular, maple, it all burns in the stove.. When it comes time to load the stove for overnite, I will sort and throw in the largets hardwood splits from my racks. I pack the stove full, throwing small chunks to the back of the stove to leave room for the longer pieces to fit in the front. I leave the draft wide open for about 30 min to allow the wood to get really hot and then cut down the draft. I usually wake up to a warm house and a large bed of coals in the stove. I then throw in the pine and lower density woods such as the popular and maple to get the fire going good in the morning. I let the fire roar, which will burn out any creosote build up from the overnite fire. During the day, I throw in just enough wood to prevent the fire from dieing out. Rinse and repeat in the evenings.I joined this site back in 2005. These wood preference threads usually break down between the scientific guys with their data and charts and the real world experience guys. In a sense, everyone is mostly right within the context of their argument. But there's no need to dismiss someone elses conclusions that are based on the parameters that exist in each of our own realities. Yeah, the "science" is correct as far as it goes, but it doesn't take into account the many different variables that each of us deal with. And there are SO many variables. What you have to choose from in a given area is one for sure. Got plenty of your favorite species or are you running a bit low and need to consider taking some less desirable wood? Different stoves in different houses with different chimneys. Indoor vs OWB's. So many choices that yield different results. It just goes on and on.
White Pine is one I'll leave behind, but I'll use it from my own property.. Sticky, messy, on the gloves, on the saws, on the clothes. Doesn't dry that quick out in the air. Won't use it in the wood stove, but It's great in the outdoor fire pit.
Doesn't get mentioned much but I'll take Hemlock. Drys quick and burns hot. Nice early season wood.
Lot of guys don't like Poplar, and I wouldn't want a whole row of it in the woodshed, but I like having some mixed in. Lights off quick when I come home to a marginal bed of coals. IMO, most of these second tier woods are fine in limited quantities mixed in with your favorites. It's when you burn them exclusively that their shortcomings become apparent.
Boxeleder....
I don't take Boxelder either.boxelder and hackberry....no thanx
There is one that I apparently would not go and cut for free and I might get flamed for this as I have access to piles of logs 10 minutes down the road and I'm not motivated to go and get it.
Black locust.
I was keen to try it and cut 5 cubes worth and burned it. Some of it went in the heater, some in the firepit and some in a bonfire. It was by far the ashiest wood I have come across. I suspect the local growing conditions may play a part since no-one in North America complains about it. I suppose it all depends what you want your firewood to do. I'd take pine because it is great to get the fire blazing from a cold start but have plenty of eucalypts that easily have the density of locust without the mess.
Morning coals - Manna gum
View attachment 765332
Morning coals - Black locust
View attachment 765333
I really like your post. Spot on in my opinion. I liked the concept of the variables you put in. The idea that different areas and environments validate a persons opinion on what works best for them.I joined this site back in 2005. These wood preference threads usually break down between the scientific guys with their data and charts and the real world experience guys. In a sense, everyone is mostly right within the context of their argument. But there's no need to dismiss someone elses conclusions that are based on the parameters that exist in each of our own realities. Yeah, the "science" is correct as far as it goes, but it doesn't take into account the many different variables that each of us deal with. And there are SO many variables. What you have to choose from in a given area is one for sure. Got plenty of your favorite species or are you running a bit low and need to consider taking some less desirable wood? Different stoves in different houses with different chimneys. Indoor vs OWB's. So many choices that yield different results. It just goes on and on.
White Pine is one I'll leave behind, but I'll use it from my own property.. Sticky, messy, on the gloves, on the saws, on the clothes. Doesn't dry that quick out in the air. Won't use it in the wood stove, but It's great in the outdoor fire pit.
Doesn't get mentioned much but I'll take Hemlock. Drys quick and burns hot. Nice early season wood.
Lot of guys don't like Poplar, and I wouldn't want a whole row of it in the woodshed, but I like having some mixed in. Lights off quick when I come home to a marginal bed of coals. IMO, most of these second tier woods are fine in limited quantities mixed in with your favorites. It's when you burn them exclusively that their shortcomings become apparent.
Yes, I wholeheartedly agree in the difficulty with splitting . However, when dried it burns well and good to mix with oak and other hardwoods to get the wood stove going. My wife likes to use it this way and that's the ONLY reason I cut it. That and to get it off our acreage!It's a bi-atch to split, but I haven't had any issues with the way it burns. It's fairly dense, and doesn't smell bad. What specific problems have you had?
Enter your email address to join: