Anybody else here doing much with the Arborjet systems?
I have found it to be a bigger pain than expected. Some trees it has gone great - others don't want to take it in.
I have tried both the Tree IV and QuickJet. The QuickJet, well, isn't. I have only used it for Tree Age which is pretty thick. If you were using a thinner chemical and a dosage closer to 2-3 ml per inch, I think this would be a good system.
One the Tree IV, I have found it necessary to keep adding pressure to the system and even then it can go slow. I tried a battery powered inflator I had, but it died on my (obviously that wasn't ArborJet's fault!). Today I picked up a CO2 adaptor (in the tool section of Lowes) that is intended to make finish nailers "cordless". I did talke to ArborJet about it and they thought it would work well. My plan is to put this on the system to keep the pressure constant. I will be putting that into pracitce next week and report back.
For now, I am just curious what others think.
I have found it to be a bigger pain than expected. Some trees it has gone great - others don't want to take it in.
I have tried both the Tree IV and QuickJet. The QuickJet, well, isn't. I have only used it for Tree Age which is pretty thick. If you were using a thinner chemical and a dosage closer to 2-3 ml per inch, I think this would be a good system.
One the Tree IV, I have found it necessary to keep adding pressure to the system and even then it can go slow. I tried a battery powered inflator I had, but it died on my (obviously that wasn't ArborJet's fault!). Today I picked up a CO2 adaptor (in the tool section of Lowes) that is intended to make finish nailers "cordless". I did talke to ArborJet about it and they thought it would work well. My plan is to put this on the system to keep the pressure constant. I will be putting that into pracitce next week and report back.
For now, I am just curious what others think.