Well, gee, Glen, I didn't mean to get your dander up! Let's back it down a notch and see what we both mean here.
I expect if we were in the same room, speaking directly to each other, we'd already have clear understanding of where each of us was coming from. This web format leads to misunderstandings at times.
I took your statement about cutting with the top of the bar being hard on the equipment to mean you disapproved of such use. Looking back at your post, I see that you clearly stated "long-term", which I overlooked at first.
I reckon you took my "hooey" statement to mean that I thought you were full of it, but my intent was to say that I believe that all sawyers use the top of the bar, it's a normal technique, and to advocate against such use was neither neccesary nor practical.
Perhaps something closer to the truth of our comments might be thus: Glen says flush cutting stumps with the top of the bar is unneccesarily wearing to the saw. Better to use a wedge or two to keep the kerf open. Burnham says using the top of the bar is useful in many situations, and must be done oftimes, but agrees that for stump removals Glen is right. What say you, Glen? Might this be so?
Those that have followed some of my posts in the past will remember that I am a big fan of wedges. Cutting big wood with the top of the bar is big work, too. I doubt I'd choose to flush cut stumps that way in the first place.
Of course, I have to have a last word here
. I have never bent or broken a bar stud, and I have never worn a bar tip out before the bar grooves were gone, so I think my level of top-of-the-bar cutting is not damaging to the saws I have run across thirty-plus years. But that is just anecdotal, and Glen's analysis of what's going on with the saw when used that way may well be dead on...but my experience has me leaning towards the point of view that the damage he forsees is theoretical...and that's just for me.