treeman218
ArboristSite Lurker
I wouldn't use that sling for anything important. Especially for straight end to end pulls.
A few comments:
-I'm not sure if I'm seeing the pics correctly but those eyes are not locking brummels but just "stitched" brummels because the tail goes through the body and then is buried.. Whatever the name they should definitely be whipped or lock-stitched in some way.
-That unterminated tail should definitely be back spliced.
- In an end to end pull on those eyes, the backsplice will probably pull through the the bury at a surprising low load. When used in a choked fashion on a tree the bend on the tree will give a little more friction but is not the best configuration to use.
My advice would be to spend the couple of dollars on some more hollow braid and make a loopie. The standard bury to make the loopie into a loop is 2 fid lengths so your 17" bury is pretty darn close but in that configuration I would guess that 4+ fid lengths of bury might be required to yield a useable tool
Be safe
A few comments:
-I'm not sure if I'm seeing the pics correctly but those eyes are not locking brummels but just "stitched" brummels because the tail goes through the body and then is buried.. Whatever the name they should definitely be whipped or lock-stitched in some way.
-That unterminated tail should definitely be back spliced.
- In an end to end pull on those eyes, the backsplice will probably pull through the the bury at a surprising low load. When used in a choked fashion on a tree the bend on the tree will give a little more friction but is not the best configuration to use.
My advice would be to spend the couple of dollars on some more hollow braid and make a loopie. The standard bury to make the loopie into a loop is 2 fid lengths so your 17" bury is pretty darn close but in that configuration I would guess that 4+ fid lengths of bury might be required to yield a useable tool
Be safe