Northman,, you really are out to lunch.... The job was 2010, so the seedling began its life in 1908.
The circumference at ground level was 32', not the 32'6" I wrote. You missed an image.
And your reading comprehension skills need some work. The 27' log DID weigh 27k lb. It matters not to me what you "doubt".The butt log, only 2-2.5' long, weighed 6500 lb. Ask Gerry Beranek.. truck loads of redwood can be full in fall/winter and half full in spring. I have cut a cubic foot of sequoia and it weighs over 70'. That was years ago, so I don't recall the weight, exactly.
And the crane was at a 50-55' radius, nowhere near full extension. but the 27k lb was over the load chart and the alarm was going off.
I've never weighed wet cottonwood. but doubt it comes close to the weight spring redwood, low on the trunk.
There was a second log truck load . bunks were probably at 20'... I have images, which are not on the album you saw.
You sure are a skeptical chap. It might help if you thought about who you are criticizing.
The circumference at ground level was 32', not the 32'6" I wrote. You missed an image.
And your reading comprehension skills need some work. The 27' log DID weigh 27k lb. It matters not to me what you "doubt".The butt log, only 2-2.5' long, weighed 6500 lb. Ask Gerry Beranek.. truck loads of redwood can be full in fall/winter and half full in spring. I have cut a cubic foot of sequoia and it weighs over 70'. That was years ago, so I don't recall the weight, exactly.
And the crane was at a 50-55' radius, nowhere near full extension. but the 27k lb was over the load chart and the alarm was going off.
I've never weighed wet cottonwood. but doubt it comes close to the weight spring redwood, low on the trunk.
There was a second log truck load . bunks were probably at 20'... I have images, which are not on the album you saw.
You sure are a skeptical chap. It might help if you thought about who you are criticizing.