McCullough
ArboristSite Lurker
Our family has always used McCullough as we were pleased with long term peformance of my Dad's 1964 250. Later we purchased a Eager Beaver 20" and a 16" Mac 3516 which we were also generally pleased. The Eager Beaver and Mac 3516 were both saws manufactured by McCullough prior to their bankruptcy. Following bankruptcy the spare parts from McCullough were purchased mainly by two individual companies and the McCullough brand disappeared from store shelves for a while. However the brand was eventually sold to a Taiwan based business.
I recently purchased one of the newer Taiwan saws, a 18" MS1839AV 39cc from hardware store chain, and although I was pleased with some of the newer design characteristics such as the fuel and bar chain refills being on the same side, the saw was horrible to use. I got a bad feeling when I first started the saw because although it has an advertised engine size above my Dad's older Eager Beaver I could tell right away that it sounded undersize based on the shear lack of loudless of engine. After making several adjustments as required for a new chain I finally just gave up trying to cut a 18" walnut log into 5 segments. This was a factory preassembled new model, not a factory remanufactured unit. Read the instruction manual religiously and even pre-oiled the entire chain. Within minutes the brand new saw was acting like my 10+ year old Mac3516 in that it would not turn the chain when your cut went beyond 1/2 " or deeper into the log. I am curious as to what would cause this to happen on a new saw? In any case its going back to the store; however sadly I am now questioning ever buying another McCullough?
I have been looking at some other saw brands. I've seen on some web sites that say Stihl tends to be a little over engineered as compared to Husqvarna and that a Stihl may require more maintainance. One thing I don't like about the Husqvarna models in stores is the perception of the type of plastic they use - its seems to made of a very hard and brittle type of plactic whereas I prefer to use models with dense molded plastic which has some give to it. I've also noticed Husqvarna is very expensive and am really uncertain if I am just paying the extra money for the currently most popular brand name as opposed to quality. It would seem brand names tend to go in cylces around here - first every store has this brand, then they switch to another. For while here everyone had Stihl, but now its Husqvarna.
I recently purchased one of the newer Taiwan saws, a 18" MS1839AV 39cc from hardware store chain, and although I was pleased with some of the newer design characteristics such as the fuel and bar chain refills being on the same side, the saw was horrible to use. I got a bad feeling when I first started the saw because although it has an advertised engine size above my Dad's older Eager Beaver I could tell right away that it sounded undersize based on the shear lack of loudless of engine. After making several adjustments as required for a new chain I finally just gave up trying to cut a 18" walnut log into 5 segments. This was a factory preassembled new model, not a factory remanufactured unit. Read the instruction manual religiously and even pre-oiled the entire chain. Within minutes the brand new saw was acting like my 10+ year old Mac3516 in that it would not turn the chain when your cut went beyond 1/2 " or deeper into the log. I am curious as to what would cause this to happen on a new saw? In any case its going back to the store; however sadly I am now questioning ever buying another McCullough?
I have been looking at some other saw brands. I've seen on some web sites that say Stihl tends to be a little over engineered as compared to Husqvarna and that a Stihl may require more maintainance. One thing I don't like about the Husqvarna models in stores is the perception of the type of plastic they use - its seems to made of a very hard and brittle type of plactic whereas I prefer to use models with dense molded plastic which has some give to it. I've also noticed Husqvarna is very expensive and am really uncertain if I am just paying the extra money for the currently most popular brand name as opposed to quality. It would seem brand names tend to go in cylces around here - first every store has this brand, then they switch to another. For while here everyone had Stihl, but now its Husqvarna.