I think that is a well thought out letter and hopefully will allow the standards to continue to evolve with tree care professionals who actually care to be compliant. The fact that the 2006 z-133 even address tying in to the crane is a huge step in the right direction, IMO, even if the language is incomplete. The instances in which a climber will remain tied into the load are so rare as to create a case by case safety plan that may not be able to be outlined in a few paragraphs of language. The one thing I have learned however, is that when straying off the path of established safety protocol, it is important to create a safety plan in writing in advance of the job, in which the reasoning for your decisions are outlined. For example, stating the OSHA regs requiring a positive locking device on the hook for a man basket which = personnell suspension, the rotation factor, separation of lifelines and rigging, etc. should all be put into writing before the job occurs, that way if something did happen, or even if OSHA or L&I show up to shut you down, you have documentation that sound judgement and interpretation of all available resources were used.