Nickrosis
Manned by Boderators
So...I'm taking the Certified Tree Worker exam this summer in Pittsburgh at the ISA Conference....
The test won't be offered in Wisconsin for some time apparently because of low interest and the work required to hold a test session. It's an important test, though, because it has the skills test portion unlike the Certified Arborist exam. I'd also like the raise I would get from the additional certification...
One surprising element is the EHAP/Aerial Rescue requirement that must be met to take the test. It seemed to stick out unusually as a requirement.... I completely understand the 1 1/2 years of experience and sort of see the CPR and First Aid requirements, but EHAP and Aerial Rescue? Sure, it's important, but should it be a requirement?
[Rambling mode]
I can foresee the arguments being that even if you never work around wires, you should be well aware of electrical hazards. And for aerial rescue, even though aerial rescue practices are so dangerous (more people dying practicing than actually saved), the reason the practices are dangerous is that speed has historically been the measurement of success. Now, progressive attitudes are that speed is practically a non-issue - the goal should remain getting the person out of the tree safely.
[/Rambling mode]
If you want more information about the test, check out the application at: http://www.isa-arbor.com/certification/treeworker.asp
The test won't be offered in Wisconsin for some time apparently because of low interest and the work required to hold a test session. It's an important test, though, because it has the skills test portion unlike the Certified Arborist exam. I'd also like the raise I would get from the additional certification...
One surprising element is the EHAP/Aerial Rescue requirement that must be met to take the test. It seemed to stick out unusually as a requirement.... I completely understand the 1 1/2 years of experience and sort of see the CPR and First Aid requirements, but EHAP and Aerial Rescue? Sure, it's important, but should it be a requirement?
[Rambling mode]
I can foresee the arguments being that even if you never work around wires, you should be well aware of electrical hazards. And for aerial rescue, even though aerial rescue practices are so dangerous (more people dying practicing than actually saved), the reason the practices are dangerous is that speed has historically been the measurement of success. Now, progressive attitudes are that speed is practically a non-issue - the goal should remain getting the person out of the tree safely.
[/Rambling mode]
If you want more information about the test, check out the application at: http://www.isa-arbor.com/certification/treeworker.asp