They are a little dark to see real well - certainly can't see where the cuts were made. Also, which trees are which? Some are obvious...but others I am not sure if one picture is the same tree as another image or if it is a new tree.
What did the client ask for? If the request was to get it away from the roof, then, yes I agree they should have cut more off (esp. pics 1/2). Pic 3 (is that tree also #4?) the tree is a little on the big side for 'training', but I'd still be trying to get a better dominate leader defined on that one and get rid of some of that mess in the middle. But maybe it was worse, and they already did some of that. Maybe that is now what the client was able to pay for??? Otherwise I don't see that they did anything that is going to harm the trees, so perhaps this is all the client wanted???
I am hesitant to judge a job like this without having seen the tree ahead of time or without knowing what was agreed upon. For example, I visited a new client this past week that had some storm damage a couple of years ago on 11 larger silver maple. The trees could use some other work in addition to the storm clean-up. I gave them a proposal for a fairly comprehensive pruning. That was too much for them, but they recognize they need to get the hangers out of the trees before they start coming down on their own. Once I am done with that, most (including myself) would look at the trees and think "there is still work to be done on those trees"...but that would put the job 30% over budget...so we will do what they are willing to pay for now. The trees will be better off, the yard will be safer, but not all will be as good as it could be.
Topping or lion's tailing are a different story. Even if a client asks for that, it is a bad practice for the health and long-term structure of the tree.