M.D. Vaden
vadenphotography.com
I got an email today from someone with a tree problem. [EDIT - just noticed the pesticide forum...anyway. There's only one thread in there. Maybe it's a good forum merge - END OF EDIT)
They hired a tree service or arborist to remove an aspen. The tree was removed, and a while later other trees died. The homeowner asked if chemical was put in the drilled holes and the service said no.
The homeowner hire a consulting arborist and soil samples were taken showing chemicals were on the property and the Dept. of Ag guys got involved and said alll point to pesticides. The tree service fessed up when told about the reports.
The homeowner, I believe, is contacting me to reaffirm the consulting arborist position, but also provide figures and ideas on the cost of repairing the landscape situation.
There's tons of proof on this so I hear.
What I was interested in - have any of you ran across this kind of damage in your areas?
Apparently this homeowner gave no okay for pesticide use on the property. They said the tree service was stating the hole drilling and pouring method was like an "industry staple" for methods. I am familiar with it, but don't think it's quite that common. Even if the label allows it, the label is not going to allow spread.
What do you folks think of this practice? To be avoided?
It was done by employees not under supervision. And I don't know if the tree service owner or boss is a licensed applicator or operator.
I was impressed by the documentation the homeowner came at me with before asking for landscape remedies. Most homeowers I hear from are in step zero or step one - just getting a grasp on the basics.
They hired a tree service or arborist to remove an aspen. The tree was removed, and a while later other trees died. The homeowner asked if chemical was put in the drilled holes and the service said no.
The homeowner hire a consulting arborist and soil samples were taken showing chemicals were on the property and the Dept. of Ag guys got involved and said alll point to pesticides. The tree service fessed up when told about the reports.
The homeowner, I believe, is contacting me to reaffirm the consulting arborist position, but also provide figures and ideas on the cost of repairing the landscape situation.
There's tons of proof on this so I hear.
What I was interested in - have any of you ran across this kind of damage in your areas?
Apparently this homeowner gave no okay for pesticide use on the property. They said the tree service was stating the hole drilling and pouring method was like an "industry staple" for methods. I am familiar with it, but don't think it's quite that common. Even if the label allows it, the label is not going to allow spread.
What do you folks think of this practice? To be avoided?
It was done by employees not under supervision. And I don't know if the tree service owner or boss is a licensed applicator or operator.
I was impressed by the documentation the homeowner came at me with before asking for landscape remedies. Most homeowers I hear from are in step zero or step one - just getting a grasp on the basics.