borat
ArboristSite Operative
The old line of "You get what you pay for." Can only carry additional cost so far. A lot of what is spent on a high end brand anything is paying for the name.
For instance, Sony TVs were the cat's a$$ for decades. With the arrival of other premium quality TVs such as Samsung for instance, costing hundreds less, Sony's premium price was for the name only. Especially today when there are numerous brands of TVs available that easily outclass equivalently priced Sonys. That rule can be applied to many products including chainsaws. You can rest assured that a good piece of Stihl's profit margin is paying for the brand.
Accordingly, Echo, which sells for less, isn't necessarily an inferior product. Chances are, that many of their smaller models are right on par with anything out there and even better than some. Echo hasn't developed the brand following mass of the other major chainsaw manufacturers. Hence, they cannot grind much out of consumers just for brand recognition.
For instance, Sony TVs were the cat's a$$ for decades. With the arrival of other premium quality TVs such as Samsung for instance, costing hundreds less, Sony's premium price was for the name only. Especially today when there are numerous brands of TVs available that easily outclass equivalently priced Sonys. That rule can be applied to many products including chainsaws. You can rest assured that a good piece of Stihl's profit margin is paying for the brand.
Accordingly, Echo, which sells for less, isn't necessarily an inferior product. Chances are, that many of their smaller models are right on par with anything out there and even better than some. Echo hasn't developed the brand following mass of the other major chainsaw manufacturers. Hence, they cannot grind much out of consumers just for brand recognition.