Facecut question.

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Got a picture of this?

Sorry no pictures. I learned it from a guy that cut in front of a forwarder. the boom on the forwarder could not reach some of the logs he bucked off (ussually down over a bank). he would cut the logs like i mentioned and if the forwarder operator could get to the first log he could pull the others (if there were any) within reach. he said it worked out now and then if it didnt then they would just get out of the forwarder and use the winch.
 
when bucking logs on a side hill i like to cut down 6'' or so from the top, bore cut the center, and cut up from the bottom. if you line the top and bottom cut up and offset the bore cut a few saw kerfs. it will hold the log from rolling down the hill and break off once the skidder hooks onto it.

Isn't that called a Russian Coupling or something like? And I've seen where the logs didn't break off. The siderod was furious, and the fallers got sent down into the brush with the rigging crew and had to buck the logs properly. I don't think they got paid for the extra work either. It was on some seriously steep ground.
 
Isn't that called a Russian Coupling or something like? And I've seen where the logs didn't break off. The siderod was furious, and the fallers got sent down into the brush with the rigging crew and had to buck the logs properly. I don't think they got paid for the extra work either. It was on some seriously steep ground.

Yup, Russian coupling. If you do it right it's a good trick to use. If you do it wrong you can bust up some valuable timber. If we were looking at sidehill runaways on steep ground we'd usually leave the tallest stumps we could down hill from the buck, cut them clean, and just let 'em fly. I've seen some bad slab-outs when that Russian coupling was a little too big and I've seen some bad runaways and slide backs when they were a little too small and broke off before anybody was ready for them.
 
Yes, and the high stumps would not hold the logs on the hill. I had to walk the boundary a few times after the crew left for the day, and logs would shift and roll on their own....I stayed well out of the way. It was one of those down, across the creek, and back up the other side clearcuts that aren't done on FS land anymore.
 
Is anyone using the open facecut technique? I heard it's the new way.

Few times with head leaning alder stock, in order to avoid splitting. Which that timber most likely will do no matter what.

Otherwise, a notch will always lose wood. Either it's a tall stump (humboldt) or a mutilated butt (conventional). With an open face you'll have them both.
 
Isn't that called a Russian Coupling or something like? And I've seen where the logs didn't break off. The siderod was furious, and the fallers got sent down into the brush with the rigging crew and had to buck the logs properly. I don't think they got paid for the extra work either. It was on some seriously steep ground.

I could see where it would cause problems if not done correctly. i have never tried it on softwoods ussually maple and beech.
 
Back
Top