Sorry for bringing up another old post, but I posted some light stuff photos for (hopefuly) judgement from ol´pards and maybe for some fun, but for some reason, whole next page and over a half was written before my post apeared on "time correct" place-it´s now on p. 146, #2186.
And now I see it stuck up under some mess from someone who quite evidently hadn´t ever seen what happens to classic film when exposed under a bit flat light on higly contrasting scene, then having nerves during developing it and dozen papers wasted while prying it into positive. Every step means sacrification of some (or a lot of) resolution of photomaterial for ability to accomodate the contrast somehow or anyhow, thus the grain rise in size. Even professional scanners, designed for the one and only purpose of scanning negatives are having big problems with negatives from such scenes. And those desktop bastards have usualy no problem to make a single blot from a maple tree, on which you can in negative (even on positive) distinguish leafs quite clearly.
Sorry boy, I´m a newby here also, but I´m here to watch some informative posts, photos, videos and big ol´trees. I realy do not want to dig to them through such stupid kidding and t-shirt jerking as you showed. I´m here for relax and enyoment, not to get annoyed. Buy yourself a Stihl in child´s collectiles part of their e-shop, it may help you during your photoshop self-education. For sure, it don´t bite back for bad manners and handling.
Edit: Last paragraph was aimed on some loud short-spike or antlerless creature, which was out of proper rut period for over four pages, being even too young for it as it seems.