forestryworks
Addicted to ArboristSite
JC will cut trees somewhere, only a matter of time and location.
By hook or by crook, MacKendrick!
JC will cut trees somewhere, only a matter of time and location.
By hook or by crook, MacKendrick!
Word tell, Idaho's gonna blow up this summer though. . . Lots of sticks gonna be hitting the ground.
You're clearly not helping me fight my addiction Bob. :hmm3grin2orange:
On the one hand, sounds good -- work and money aplenty -- on the other hand, if I get deployed on a bunch of project fires elsewhere, what will we lose here? I'm in Placerville, CA right now for advanced cruiser training. Friday I'm in Tampa, FL, mostly on vacation. We've already had a pile of fires in the last week. Last year? A swing and a miss. The fuels are there to cause a record year for fires, but what of the weather?
Talking with FS folk, there is a general concern over a lack of standards between regions. R5 vs R6? Sure, makes sense. BUT -- what about within regions? R6 includes, for example, both Colville and Klamath. Those are in NO WAY the same bioregions. Yet, the USFS wants to administer fire control within the region as though it was somehow "the same".
Are we just looking at a R5 "People's Republik Of Kalifornia vs Everyone Else" thing, or is there a serious disconnect? Well, rumor as it that NorCal is on standby while SoCal is deployed to TX/NM/OK. Is this OK? Will NorCal be comp'd later in the season?
On the one hand, sounds good -- work and money aplenty -- on the other hand, if I get deployed on a bunch of project fires elsewhere, what will we lose here? I'm in Placerville, CA right now for advanced cruiser training. Friday I'm in Tampa, FL, mostly on vacation. We've already had a pile of fires in the last week. Last year? A swing and a miss. The fuels are there to cause a record year for fires, but what of the weather?
Talking with FS folk, there is a general concern over a lack of standards between regions. R5 vs R6? Sure, makes sense. BUT -- what about within regions? R6 includes, for example, both Colville and Klamath. Those are in NO WAY the same bioregions. Yet, the USFS wants to administer fire control within the region as though it was somehow "the same".
Are we just looking at a R5 "People's Republik Of Kalifornia vs Everyone Else" thing, or is there a serious disconnect? Well, rumor as it that NorCal is on standby while SoCal is deployed to TX/NM/OK. Is this OK? Will NorCal be comp'd later in the season?
I watched a logger get turned away from a fire with his D6. He was close and crawled right up to the seat of the burn while it was still under an acre. He was told to go away, because he wasn't "qualified" to do anything. That particular fire burned a lot more ground before it was all said and done.
As an example there was some flooding. A big tree on a river bank was over into the swollen river, pushing hard against a bridge that was needed to evacuate a small community that was flooding. The only guy that worked for the highway department with proper credentials to run a saw that big was over an hour away. So they just sat there with the bridge closed, cars backing up on the wrong side, waiting.
It was pretty simple but very dangerous, cut the tree at the stump, it would turn, go under the bridge and move downstream to the lake.
An older logger came by and offered to make the cut. I didn't know him but you could tell in a glance he knew his stuff, everything from the old 4x4 truck to the clothes to his saws in the back. Highway guys said "No, we have to wait for our guy." It was stupid so I said "My badge trumps your highway authority. I'm giving the go ahead for him to make the cut. Anything goes wrong you can blame it on me."
Old guy sized it up and made the cut in about ten minutes. Bridge was saved, people evacuated, highway guys pretended it never happened. I was told their official report would say that the tree worked free by itself.
Mr. HE
Kind of a thread drift, but beware the operations fire. Make darn sure you have the correct amount of hose, tools, etc. When the fire is out, if agencies have responded, they WILL look for a way for you to pay for it. I went through this experience. The fire guy suddenly became a timber sale contract "expert" and mentioned that there was a roll of hose missing on the fire truck, and that meant the fire was "negligent". I had to point out that the extra roll of hose would still not reach to where the fire was, and the logger had it under control by the time they arrived. He had put a cat line around it, and the sky opened up and doused the flames. The cause was a feller buncher catching on fire and burning up. It also sounded like the fire crew was milking their time on the mop up a bit. Anyway, the FS ended up not getting paid for their response.
Things can get extra nasty so make sure you have everything up to snuff. The blame game is alive and well, especially in lean budget years.
Don't even get me started on some of the shystery things I've seen DNR and FS do on fires. :bang:
By all means.........get started!opcorn:
I'd say 33% of why I quit going on fires was because of all the wasteage. My taxes were paying for that BS.
I shall tell one episode. I went as overhead, also known as overfed, and worked in the plans dept. The fire was winding down. The fire was in mopup and crews were starting to be sent elsewhere. In comes a load of plywood. The IC (incident commander) had ordered the plywood, knowing that the fire was about done for, because he wanted to show a buddy how fast those "hamburger stands" could be assembled. So, the carpenter guys went to work and construction was finished, the next day they were torn down as everybody was to be demobed--fire over.
But not to worry, the ranger district got to have the used plywood so nothing wrong....right? :bang:
Fine example Miss P. How bout getting saws, tools, sleeping bags, tents, water jugs, etc. . . All thrown in a hole dug by a cat. The the dozer runs it's tracks over it a few times to crush it good, and bury it.
All to keep their budget numbers good for the money they want to blow the next year.
Super. . .
I think I'm gonna barf, but it might not be a bad idea to take not of the gear "cache" and head back later just to see if a guy could maybe dig up a 440 or 3 that hadn't gotten hit
It used to be, that loggers would just segue into firefighting from logging. . . But now it's all political and harder to get on.
I watched a logger get turned away from a fire with his D6. He was close and crawled right up to the seat of the burn while it was still under an acre. He was told to go away, because he wasn't "qualified" to do anything. That particular fire burned a lot more ground before it was all said and done.
Enter your email address to join: