soiset
ArboristSite Member
Once again, another homeowner in my neighborhood (where I do all my work) has had his Live Oaks brutally lion-tailed. I stopped by, and spoke with the homeowner about it (and the cabling one of the trees very badly needs). We had a very genial talk, and he was receptive, and concerned. Of course, his reasoning was that all the trees he saw were pruned this way, which they largely are, because most tree work in Dallas is done by jackleg illiterates like the guys who did this, "Salgado's Lawn Service". He was concerned though, that they'd removed too much, which they certainly had - about 50% of the crown.
The branches have a huge length-to-diameter ratio, because the tree has consistently been lion-tailed for the last decade or more. It is around 55 years old.
The only way I know to correct this takes a decade or more: when the tree bursts out with epicormic sprouts, allow them to grow for a bit, then go in and carefully select the best ones for future interior growth, and remove the rest. After long enough, they will have become large enough to subordinate the leader to. Slowly reduce the crown of the tree, and maybe after 15 years, it will be in good shape, assuming it hasn't fallen completely apart by that time.
This tree, like most others here, was not trained properly, and has very poorly connected codominant stems. The owner, of course, loves having big trees in his yard, but also loves having a thick lawn (typical sentiments here that lead to the lion-tailing).
So, how effective do you think the long-term solution I've laid out above is, and what do you think about the wisdom of it? These Live Oaks can live for hundreds of years, but the way they are abused, they won't make it to 100, maybe not 80. Is it better to just remove the tree now, and start over?View attachment 250316
The branches have a huge length-to-diameter ratio, because the tree has consistently been lion-tailed for the last decade or more. It is around 55 years old.
The only way I know to correct this takes a decade or more: when the tree bursts out with epicormic sprouts, allow them to grow for a bit, then go in and carefully select the best ones for future interior growth, and remove the rest. After long enough, they will have become large enough to subordinate the leader to. Slowly reduce the crown of the tree, and maybe after 15 years, it will be in good shape, assuming it hasn't fallen completely apart by that time.
This tree, like most others here, was not trained properly, and has very poorly connected codominant stems. The owner, of course, loves having big trees in his yard, but also loves having a thick lawn (typical sentiments here that lead to the lion-tailing).
So, how effective do you think the long-term solution I've laid out above is, and what do you think about the wisdom of it? These Live Oaks can live for hundreds of years, but the way they are abused, they won't make it to 100, maybe not 80. Is it better to just remove the tree now, and start over?View attachment 250316