TopJimmy said:One more thought on the Stihl vs Husky. I think that if there were an objective way to measure each saw, we would find that certain models of each brand would come out on top. Stihl 200T is one that comes to mind.
Jim
We'd have to first determine what is most important and by how much. Sort feature by feature in a "weighted value" way. Is power-to-weight more important than efficciency or vibration levels or noise levels or than another feature or characteristic, and by how much? What's important to one guy does not mean squat to the next. My MS290, for example, is a good machine for me due to it's affordability, reputation for reliablility, and adequate power. Other guys would readily poo-poo that notion, as affordablity means nothing (perhaps because the relative affordablilty to me just would not be ther in a pro or logging environment). I hear what you're sayin' but it would be one tough nut to crack. Perhaps a class-by class run-down would work, but defining class upper and lower limits would be tough, too. Sounds like fun, but it would be a data collection nightmare.