Sentience in trees...always an interesting subject. Just yesterday my gm and I were discussing a big black locust (Robinia) takedown we did over the primaries that was covered with English ivy. It had many conks (Phellinus robineae) on it and obviously extensive decay.
The ivy was so heavy on it that it formed an exo skeleton (I kid you not) and if it was not on there the tree would certainly have fallen over. A locust nearby that lost its top (no need for support) had no climbing vines to speak of but plenty at the base in a bed. This would be sentience in vines I suppose being opportunistic and possibly getting sustanence from the decay and water as well to gain size and exposure to sun and maximize benefits from the situation.
But the relationship of fungi with trees is a better topic. It is referred to as endosymbiotic relations and relies on cellular memory.
From "Nature" 2002 on plant intelligence...
"Since plants do not have a brain they have to rely on cellular memory. Hence you are asking if plants can remember using some other organ analog that resembles a brain. Perhaps this may occur through their endosymbiotic relations with fungi, but I am not aware of any research demonstrating this. (Treevet...How about Shigo's research with CODIT on Wall 4 where a barrier is preformed well beyond the point of attack....to protect wood formed after wounding?) I can envision an analog in a sense, synaptic connections vs networks of fungal hyphae exchanging information."
"Studies involving grafting and localized cooling have shown that the apical meristem is the site of cold perception during vernalization, and that vernalization causes the meristem to become competent to flower. Once meristems have been exposed to prolonged cold, they remember that they have been vernalized and this memory is mitotically stable." (Sung and Amasino,2004)
A response to this in the posts below JPS topic vid...
"Sentience is the ability to perceive, not just a sense but to perceive, to feel or cognitively assign value to that which is sensed (positive, negative or neutral) and FURTHERMORE act accordingly." (Again Wall 4 IMO)
Another poster..."Cells have sensory capabilities, but lack a mind to apprehend the collected information to bring about awareness of its meaning."
Another poster (Jason)..."Plants are not intelligent. No evidence to indicate plants are sentient beings....emancipated, capable of making choices.
They are incredibly complex biological machines with a genetic supply of behaviors that have been rigidly chosen through natural selection. "Their actions are not learned but rather selected".
(Mark response)"Isn't learning another form of selection?"