SilverKing
ArboristSite Guru
those saws are completely different.The 925 has the flag style chain brake
i meant 920
those saws are completely different.The 925 has the flag style chain brake
those saws are completely different.The 925 has the flag style chain brake
The 490 and the 590 were pure Partners, just rebranded - what beats me is why the 535 still was in production in 1992 (as a silvertop "classic"), several years after the 490/590 were replaced by the 2051...?E-lux had acquired Partner by the time these saws came out and, thankfully, used their trigger handle design. It was the weakest point on the 910e's (I have a few with busted handles....and cases! It also was a poor design on the 510. I am not saying this made them that much better. I mean, you can spray air freshener on a turd and while it may smell nice, it still is a turd. doesn't mean I wouldn't like to get a few of mine running so I could use them. But, those darn air and vac leaks have been VERY hard to pin down. Still go to the 490 for that sized stuff, but if I got one of mine running, it wouldn't do too bad as a first saw for my boy to start learning on.
The 490 and the 590 were pure Partners, just rebranded - what beats me is why the 535 still was in production in 1992 (as a silvertop "classic"), several years after the 490/590 were replaced by the 2051...?
Maybe they had a large stock of parts still remaining for it and they thought this would be the most cost efficient?? You are right about the 490. I still like it better than the 500 that I had....seemed more cheaply built. I would still love to have that saw back, though! Why oh why did i sell it!!!
I am no expert on those saws, but the P500 was a "semi-pro" version of the P5000 - and the 490 was based on the (pro) 5000, but without the recoil side "handle brace". As I understand it, the 590 was the late version P5000+, with the 45mm bore, and the "handle brace".
I am no expert on those saws, but the P500 was a "semi-pro" version of the P5000 - and the 490 was based on the (pro) 5000, but without the recoil side "handle brace". As I understand it, the 590 was the late version P5000+, with the 45mm bore, and the "handle brace".
Also the 500 did not have the windowed piston and closed transfers like the 5000+
tm
The 490 and the 590 were pure Partners, just rebranded - what beats me is why the 535 still was in production in 1992 (as a silvertop "classic"), several years after the 490/590 were replaced by the 2051...?
That is the lower power version from the 625/630/670 line of saws. If my memory serves ( I hope I haven't switched these around), it is an open port design, whereas the 630 was a closed port. Depending on price, I would rarely hesitate from picking up a 6-- saw. Working, nice looking chain brakes will bring $40 or more alone. If it is a nice looking, in good shape with a bar, type saw, I would pick it up for $125-150. Really nice, I would go to $175. Will pull a 20" bar just fine, although I use a 7 pin sprocket for that size bar.
That is the lower power version from the 625/630/670 line of saws. If my memory serves ( I hope I haven't switched these around), it is an open port design, whereas the 630 was a closed port. Depending on price, I would rarely hesitate from picking up a 6-- saw. Working, nice looking chain brakes will bring $40 or more alone. If it is a nice looking, in good shape with a bar, type saw, I would pick it up for $125-150. Really nice, I would go to $175. Will pull a 20" bar just fine, although I use a 7 pin sprocket for that size bar.
Enter your email address to join: