I have a brand new 460, and just got the cover, and wanted to know if all those that have done the modification on their muffler with this cover gutted the muffler or just replaced the cover.
CaseyForrest said:I am going to replace it with the stock cover that has the hole on the side.
fishhuntcutwood said:The stock cover doesn't have any holes in it.
Jeff
If you want to make it exactly like the old magnum mufflers you have to enlarge the hole on right side the muffler to 3/4. I am talking about the muffler itself , not the cover. You will also have to remove the basket that surrounds the exhaust port if your saw has one..I shouldnt have to add any holes or enlarge the one on the new cover, should I?
WoodTick007 said:What are the Stihl Part numbers for the Dual Port covers for the 044 and 066?
WoodTick007 said:What are the Stihl Part numbers for the Dual Port covers for the 044 and 066?
I havent as the 044 I put a dual port cover on didnt have one. I would think that having a box, regardless of the number of holes and their resulting area would have a negative effect on performance. A turbulance inducing devise so close to the piston is never a good idea.Has anyone actually done any TESTs dual port mufflers WITH AND WITHOUT removal of the internal box? The sum of the area of all the holes on the internal boxes I've seen exceed the opening area of most reasonable muffer mods... Stihl had internal boxes in many mufflers a long time before they started reducing the outlet for EPA
Noise regs maybe?If it's "not a good idea" why is it put there? Particularly way way pre-epa?