Lets get this party started...

[MasterBlaster]

This is from a year ago.

 

[MasterBlaster]

Man, this camera rocks. I'm ready to sell it, and get an even better one. It takes a big frigging picture!

Here's one Glen will frown upon!

 

[rborist1]

:Eye:

 

[MasterBlaster]

I bought it at Target, I didn't know what I was looking for, I just knew I wanted at least 3 pixels. After buying a 128 mb card, it cost me $450. $35 was freaking tax!

Here's a link...

http://www.bytesector.com/data/bs-article.asp?ID=228&ct=Latest Resources

 

[rborist1]

:Eye:

 

[rumination]

Looks like who?

 

[NeTree]

Huh?

 

[MasterBlaster]

This iz getting con-fusing...

I feel all Maascloned out...

 

[MasterBlaster]

It was intimidating at first, but easy to figure out. I've taken over 200 pics since I got it yesterday.

Does it have a 10 times optical zoom? I didn't think I would like that so much, but it's pretty cool. You can take a nice pic from a distance.

RBTree, where you iz? Did me 'n the squirrel do good?

 

[MasterBlaster]

We've gone too off topic, back to tree pics.

Some hacks in a cheap bucket truck did this to a nice water oak. I have to drive by it nearly every day.

I will follow the pic up at a later date.

 

[NeTree]

Maybe they used a tapered hinge to swing the branch out?

 

[rbtree]

Originally posted by MasterBlaster

RBTree, where you iz? Did me 'n the squirrel do good?

Yep, you dun guud, minimaas!
___________________________________-
Mini-Wan Maas.

 

[NeTree]

Where's the lil button that makes it talk?

{my 5-year-old asked}

 

[MasterBlaster]

Well, lets get this party started!!!

 

[MasterBlaster]

Ya'll outta be proud of me... NO TD's!!!

 

[Treeman14]

Originally posted by MasterBlaster
Some hacks in a cheap bucket truck did this to a nice water oak.

That's inexcusable. Maybe they ran out of tree paint.

 

[glens]

Originally posted by RockyJSquirrel
The box says it has 3X optical and 4X digital zoom for a total combined 12X zoom.

Optical zoom is, of course, before the image is taken while digital zoom is after the fact.  The optical "zoom" is preferred since once the pixels are recorded the little squares will only get bigger and the image will become blockier.  There are a multitude of programs that'll run on the computer to enlarge images; no need for a camera to do that (and probably less well anyway).

Glen

 

[glens]

Originally posted by MasterBlaster
Here's one Glen will frown upon!

Yup.  A 50% reduction renders it nearly full screen at 1152×864 like I run on my 17" monitor.  Why do you guys like to scroll around the screen to see the entire image, small parts at a time?  And if you're viewing it in your browser in a resized fashion, why do you post them so large it's necessary to do so?

BTW, I'm sitting on 350KB/s these past couple weeks, so I knew you'd oversized your image by seeing it rather than by waiting for it...

Glen

 

[a_lopa]

whats that mike????????

 

[MasterBlaster]

Now Brian, you gonna have to scold yourself for not resizing!